This Nest, Swift Passerine, Dan Beachy-Quick. Tupelo Press. 72pp, $16.95.
“Overambitious projects may be objectionable in many fields, but not in literature. Literature remains alive only if we set ourselves immeasurable goals, far beyond all hope of achievement. Only if poets and writers set themselves tasks that no one else dares imagine will literature continue to have a function.” — Italo Calvino, Six Memos for the Next Millennium
Nobody could accuse Dan Beachy-Quick of being anything other than ambitious. A poet who has twice taken on Moby-Dick is one whose courage hardly needs to be questioned, let alone tested. Nevertheless, fresh off last fall’s essay collection, A Whaler’s Dictionary, Beachy-Quick summons another epic task in the opening line of his most recent collection of poems, This Nest, Swift Passerine:
The daily all everywhere disclosed
From this all-encompassing evocation, Beachy-Quick swiftly takes the reader to a locus of convergence: astronomy, the diaries of Dorothy Wordsworth, meditations on the poetic line, the myth of Echo, technological achievements, Keats’s Grecian urn, the role of the poet in the contemporary world, a directional compass, and countless other seemingly disparate topics converge in this singular book of poetry. To draw them together Beachy-Quick relies on three fundamental openings of perception in the human body—the eyes, the mouth, and the ears:
But how find how as it flew onward
& the mountains gave back the sound
to say what I mean the call of the bird
& the echoe after to say I’ve seen? . . .
The echo after we could see Light in echo the eye sees
also through the ear a double infinity
The italicized sections are material directly quoted from other sources, in this case the diaries of Dorothy Wordsworth. These quotations, which reoccur throughout the book, go beyond simple allusion, produced verbatim yet completely removed from their origin, wrapped instead within this work’s own internal narrative. Beachy-Quick simultaneously embraces and escapes the burden of others’ words—but even when he resorts to the poet’s traditional escape to nature, the poetry of a bird’s song overwhelms him. The echo represents not only the birdcalls repeated and answered by other birds but also the poet’s own remembrances of past experiences listening to birds, and even the words of past writers.
As has become typical of Beachy-Quick’s work, these poems exhibit a comfort with the sounds of language. Towers of phonemes are placed one atop the next, meanings intertwined with the visual impression on the page:
to humble my eye I double my
eye note the water strider’s orb
this sphere sings that I must sing
each leg on tense water stands
on each leg to draw its circle just
Each sound is a note of song that creates a beauty beyond the bare meaning of the word, allowing the poems to function on a purely sonic level like the bird songs that recur throughout them.
The choice of passerine in the title fits into both the theme of singing and the self-imposed task of incorporating the infinite: the order Passeriformes, to which it refers, includes over half of all species of birds—most of them songbirds. As with most birds, passerines utilize a different method of vocalization than humans; instead of a vocal cord, the passerine has a syrinx, which creates sound through vibration and an oscillating air supply. This different form of singing informs Beachy-Quick’s obsession with the utterance of sound:
Each one an Echo and Echo myself
Chaos the root in my mouth: silence:
The child’s mouth before a tooth breaks throughAnd then tongue presses against teeth
And speaks a word:Born into the order of words
(pointing at a tree the mother says, Tree(pointing still mother says, Branch
(and still, seeing now what the child sees, Nest)Nest the word echoes
Through centuries my mouth This NestAlive with words not spoken by me
Which I repeat back, repeat backIn the world to make my meaning heard
When Beachy-Quick looks outwards from his self, the poetry, as the verses above show, is powerful, engaging, and provoking. But the Melvillean task of encompassing the whole world necessarily brings with it some failures. When he turns entirely inward, the verse becomes muddled and predictable:
The city buses speed down the avenue as the monarchs sift down to the flowers.
Each one dead from that collision would be one less of the dwindling whole.
I feared for them; I could not turn away.
The attempt to demonstrate a closeness with nature amid the surrounding chaos of civilization generates an unoriginal and unrevealing line. Such moments are rare, however, as the collection almost entirely emanates outward from the poet’s senses and rarely turns explicitly within. As the world is viewed, heard, smelled, touched, and tasted, the reader is given indirect access to the poet’s internal thoughts and emotions, which wash over the reader through the filter of the verse.
In Paterson, William Carlos Williams writes:
. . . unless there is
a new mind there cannot be a new
line, the old will go on
repeating itself with recurring
deadliness . . .
The weight of this task informs the explorations in this collection. The old surrounds the poet, from the Wordsworths to Keats to Ronald Johnson to Tolstoy, but the allusions and songs from the past do not overwhelm Beachy-Quick:
. . . Their throats cool
My throat. I cannot sing their song for you.
Rather, he must and will create his own lyrics. He hears these songs, but he can only sing with his own voice. His address here directly to the reader speaks to the necessity of his writing and vocalization. Not only must Beachy-Quick do it for himself, we as readers need his voice to avoid Williams’s “recurring deadliness.”
Moreover, the poet/narrator experiences the act of creation as a moment of ecstatic knowledge that wipes history clean and leaves only the residues behind, the form of a poem:
Then forgot the words to the clear tone. Then forgot to speak. Then my
blood vibrated with the working of the tree. Then a book was leaves on
water, spread out, so the water couldn’t be seen. Then ecstasy rippled.
Then the stars were on the water. Then I looked up. Then I forgot the
constellations—Orion, Hydra, Dipper, Bear—and only saw the light
piercing through the dark. Then I had no story but this poem.
Beachy-Quick attempts to explore the call of nature and the relationship between it and us as humans. He tests out the theories of his poetic ancestors—the Wordsworthian nature as an opening into the lyric and the past; the transcendentalists’ immersion into nature as a pathway to greater understanding; the Keatsian “Beauty is truth, truth beauty.” Ultimately, these explorations through other poets, through the surrounding civilization, and through nature lead to the conclusion:
There is the sky / / It is blue / /
Beneath it the good green earth lives / /
I had no other thought. Here I dwell.
For a brief moment clarity is achieved, and the simplicity of the sky and the earth is enough in itself for fulfillment. For a moment the voices of the surrounding songs dissipate and the poet reaches the moment of transcendence. Everything is disclosed, everything is simple within its infiniteness.
Andrew Wessels has lived in Houston, Los Angeles, and Cambridge. He currently is pursuing an MFA in poetry at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas. He also writes A Compulsive Reader.
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.