The Pages, Murray Bail. Vintage. 224pp.
Australian novelist Murray Bail made a note in the early 1970s in which he instructed himself to “Invent (for depth of individuality); less ‘reportage.’” He seems to have followed it quite faithfully. From the outset, Bail’s fiction has been driven by this commitment to imagination and a concomitant disregard, verging on contempt, for the conventions of realism. Bail is a storyteller, but not in the reactionary “thumping good read” sense. He belongs rather to the tradition of Borges and Calvino, a tradition in which the conventions of folk storytelling (fables, parables, tall tales) meld with modern (often modernist) literary techniques. Postmodernism, magic realism—call it what you will, this is a storytelling tradition that, among other things, conducts a reflexive dialogue with the very idea of story itself. As a character in Bail’s novel Eucalyptus puts it, “beware of any man who deliberately tells a story. . . . Why is he telling it? What does he want?”
Bail’s early short fiction, collected in Contemporary Portraits (1975; subsequently amended and retitled numerous times), sometimes gives a sly impersonation of “dun coloured realism” (Patrick White’s dismissive characterization of most Australian fiction) before twisting out of its grip; more often it is subtly and willfully absurd. Homesickness, Bail’s first novel, abandoned realism (and subtlety) altogether to tell the surreal story of a group of generally unpleasant Australian tourists traipsing around the world on a package tour. Homesickness mercilessly satirizes Australian boorishness, provincialism, and ignorance, and although (one hopes) Australia is a markedly more sophisticated place nearly 30 years on, it is impossible to deny the accuracy of many of Bail’s observations. Of course, this description makes Homesickness itself sound provincial; in fact it is a capacious work, full of fascinating and often bizarre set-pieces in which everything from photography to museums to colonialism is examined through Bail’s absurdist lens.
Holden’s Performance (1987) and Eucalyptus (1998) consolidated Bail’s aesthetic of laconic, playful language, detached irony, and ambiguous, almost obsessive toying with a cluster of preoccupations. Eucalyptus was the big hit: an international bestseller and critical favorite, it came perilously close to being adapted into a film starring Russell Crowe. A dreamlike fairy tale, it is Bail’s most approachable book, but its surface conventionality is deceptive. The connection between Bail’s fiction and Italo Calvino’s may in truth be more one of incidental kinship than actual influence, but Eucalyptus reminds me of certain Calvino works in the way its metaphysical and metafictional concerns are embedded deep within the story. This is a book that can be read superficially as a modern fairy tale or an offbeat love story, but it is also an interrogation of storytelling, proclaiming story’s necessity while simultaneously exploring its artificiality, or rather artfulness.
The Pages, Bail’s new novel, currently available in Australia and forthcoming from Vintage in the U.S. in 2009, has affinities with his earlier work but is also a singular, idiosyncratic piece in its own right. The story concerns Wesley Antill, scion of a well-off pastoral family, who forsakes farming for philosophy, spending the final 14 years of his life holed up in a woolshed on the family sheep station writing his magnum opus. Wesley’s siblings, Roger and Lindsey, prove almost preternaturally accommodating, allowing their brother the mental and physical space his putative genius requires while declining to make demands on him vis-à-vis the running of the farm.
Antill is an outsider, a non-academic autodidact who neither publishes nor discusses his philosophy. When Antill dies, a Sydney philosopher named Erica Hazlehurst is dispatched to the farm by her university to evaluate Antill’s work. Is it coherent, significant, publishable? Erica is accompanied by her friend Sophie Perloff, a psychoanalyst. The relationship between the two women and their often conflicting methodologies, as well as their interaction with Roger and Lindsey, forms the novel’s spine. This narrative is intertwined with a kind of intellectual bildungsroman detailing Wesley’s rebellion against his family and his travels through Europe in search of a foundation for his philosophy.
It is difficult to get a firm grip on The Pages. Having read it several times, and being familiar with Bail’s ways, I feel that this difficulty is partly by design. Even more so than his early work, The Pages is elusive, ambiguous. For example: How seriously are we meant to take Wesley Antill? How substantial is his philosophy? Does the answer to either of these questions matter? Bail’s fiction consistently raises questions of this kind; the reader is rarely sure what she is “supposed” to think. This is of course one of the attractions of the fiercely individual artist—the last thing anyone needs is more join-the-dots, reader-flattering fiction.
Yet The Pages does at times have a tendency toward the obvious, most notably in the friendship between Erica and Sophie, which constitutes a symbolic binary so simplistic that it is difficult to take seriously. Erica is the “sharp,” reserved, systematic one; she is a philosopher, but she also represents (wait for it) philosophy itself. Sophie is the soft, emotional, “feminine” one; she is, of course, psychoanalysis, personifying “the rush towards the subjective” that Bail sees as endemic in modern Western society.
Oddly, this groan-inducing symbolism provides a foundation for a more complex interplay between various forms of solipsism and objectivity. A familiar Bail trope is language’s incapacity of to sufficiently capture reality, the way in which words construct an intellectual or cultural reality but remain separate from actual objective reality. Wandering around the Antill property, Erica “could see how everything already existed without description.” Yet names, classification, words, are vitally important to human existence, even in seemingly trivial ways. For instance, Wesley at one point inquires into the possibility of changing his name, feeling that “Antill” is too “light” a name for a philosopher. Wesley is ostensibly a searcher for foundational truths, but he is still trapped, and complicit, in the constructed reality of language and its implications.
A story too is a kind of constructed reality, recognition of which constitutes a fatal objection to naïve realism: it simply isn’t real enough. In fact, it’s not even close. Is realism a symptom of solipsism? The social phenomenon Bail identifies as the “looseness and ease of ‘I’” has its literary analogue in the trend toward first person confessional narratives. As Bail writes in Eucalyptus, “A kind of applied psychology has taken over storytelling, coating it and obscuring the core.” Contrast the creative writing adage “write what you know” with Bail’s youthful dictum, “Invent . . . ; less ‘reportage.’” In art, as in life, the danger is not so much lack of objectivity—which is inevitable anyway—but the refusal to acknowledge that lack. Antill ultimately seems to realize this, rejecting grand, “objective” system building in favor of philosophy as a mode of being: contemplation of “life as a series of . . . sobering alterations.”
For all its teasing complexity, The Pages is probably the least of Bail’s novels to date. Certainly it is the least witty, which is a shame given that Bail’s are some of the wittiest novels going. The structure is haphazard and the ideas, while often stimulating and enigmatic in the usual Bail manner, are just as often labored or simply confusing. Yet The Pages is for the most part an intensely enjoyable novel that somehow manages to be simultaneously charming and infuriating; dense, but also light and playful. It is another example of Murray Bail’s singular talent, and I recommend it without hesitation.
Tim Howard is a freelance writer from Melbourne, Australia.
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.