One of my favorite episodes from Thucydides is when the Athenians decide to whether to invade Syracuse. With Athens already stretched by the demands of the war with Sparta, their leader Pericles reminds them how difficult a task such an expedition will be—the cost, the number of ships, the number of men. It would require an unprecedented effort, and would not be advisable under any circumstances, let alone in the middle of a war with a formidable opponent much closer at hand. The Athenians, of course, decide to mount the invasion anyway, with disastrous results.
Why is it that men (nearly always, we are talking about men) undertake seemingly impossible tasks, and why do they seem even more willing to do it when their immediate circumstances are so bleak?
Kelly Tyler-Lewis’s new book, The Lost Men: The Harrowing Saga of Shackleton’s Ross Sea Party, is the latest chronicle of futile efforts further undermined by impossible odds and doubtful timing. At current count, several recent books, documentaries, and even an IMAX film have covered Ernest Shackleton’s now legendary failed attempt to be the first explorer to cross Antarctica. His ship Endurance became trapped in the sea ice before he even spotted land in the Weddell Sea. The ship was eventually crushed, forcing Shackleton to sail a 20-foot dinghy 2,000 miles across some of the most tempestuous seas on the planet to find help for his party, who he had left behind on an isolated island to survive on penguin and seal meat.
But fewer books have described the equally dramatic efforts of the second half of Shackleton’s expedition, charged with laying supply caches for the trans-Antarctic team on the other side of the continent. Tyler-Lewis’s book makes an admirable attempt to tell this neglected portion of the story.
When Shackleton was planning his expedition, securing over £100,000 in financing for two ships and two independent teams of explorers, he had no way of knowing that the year he planned to depart would be the first year of World War I. As his ship was loaded on the London docks with military-style provisions and commanded by some of the ablest leaders and sailors in the British empire, Britain declared war on Germany. Shackleton had to obtain last-minute permission from Winston Churchill, who if he knew what was to follow, both for the war and for Shackleton’s expedition, almost certainly wouldn’t have allowed it.
While Shackleton’s party headed for the island of Georgia near South America, The Ross Sea Party booked steamer passage to Australia, where Shackleton had purchased another ship, the Aurora, to support their efforts. The Aurora’s crew was to place supplies deep in Antarctica, which Shackleton’s men would use to reach the South Pole.
By the time the party commander, Aeneas Mackintosh, arrived in Tasmania, Shackleton was already on his way to the Antarctic, unreachable. That was unfortunate because Mackintosh found the Aurora in a state of utter disrepair, completely inadequate to match the demands of the planned journey. Repairing the ship would cost at least £3,000, and Shackleton had only provided Mackintosh with a budget of £2,000 for the entire expedition, with an extra £1,000 in case of emergency. Mackintosh was left with no funds whatsoever for staffing the journey, or purchasing fuel, food, sled dogs, and all the other necessities of Antarctic travel. In the end, the budget was cut even further from the London headquarters, and Mackintosh was reduced to begging for donations in Australia.
Finally, on December 23, 1914, with the world now embroiled in full-scale war, Mackintosh set sail for Antarctica with a shore party of ten and a ship’s crew of 18. He had scraped together over £5,100 in donations from an already war-burdened nation.
One of the difficulties in any narrative about a major expedition is how to introduce the cast of characters. Tyler-Lewis takes the most obvious approach, offering a paragraph or two about each of the team members as the expedition sets sail. While such exposition may seem modest, it’s easy to get lost as one description melds into another. There’s little incentive for readers to pay close attention at this point, for the real adventure hasn’t even started. I prefer a different approach—either giving the character’s background when his role in the expedition becomes relevant, or providing a reference list of characters with short biographies at the beginning or end of the book.
Mackintosh’s team was expected to utilize the bases built for the Amundsen and Scott expeditions of 1910 as headquarters for their own journey. The ill-fitted Aurora was to anchor nearby in Ross sea, lay supplies deep in Antarctica, and return to meet Shackleton and crew when their job was done, hopefully by March of 1915, as the Antarctic “summer” came to a close. But if Mackintosh’s team was unable to lay all the supplies in 1915, the plan was to winter in the Antarctic, along with the icebound Aurora, and finish the job in the summer of 1916—hoping that Shackleton, too, had taken an extra year to complete his journey.
From almost the moment Mackintosh arrived in the Antarctic, the mission was beset with a litany of problems. Repairing the ship had delayed their start by nearly a month. The Aurora was blown away from the landing in a storm before all the supplies could be unloaded. The motor-sled they had planned to use to haul most of the load proved useless in the cold weather. Rushing to make up time, they overloaded the dog sleds, and this, combined with a lack of training, made for even slower going. In one particularly brutal stretch of sledging at the end of the first summer, an entire team of dogs died of starvation as the men barely made it back to their base camp.
Perhaps worst of all, after that first ruinous summer, only a fraction of the supplies had been hauled into position. The icebound Aurora was unable to meet the shore party, so the shore party was forced to winter on scant supplies in Amundson and Scott’s huts and whatever seal meat they could harvest.
By the second summer, only one team of dogs remained, but thanks to their handler and second in command Ernest Joyce, they were in fine shape, and the dogs were able to haul most of the necessary supplies. Joyce’s dog team raced with four men led by Mackintosh to lay the final supply depot, more than 83 degrees south. At 81 degrees south, Mackintosh and several of the others were showing signs of scurvy, but the same stubbornness that served Mackintosh so well in rustling together the financing for the mission in Australia nearly a year and a half before now almost proved his undoing. He insisted on accompanying Joyce all the way to the final supply depot. One of the men on his team became disabled, and during the return journey, Mackintosh too, eventually had to be carried on the sled.
Slowed by carrying two disabled men, the party was bogged down in a blizzard, and one man died of scurvy before they were able to reach the base camp, with its vitamin C-rich seal meat. The Ross Sea party had managed to lay the supplies for Shackleton, but at a horrible cost, which would rise even higher before the shore party was finally rescued in 1917.
The irony of the vanity that leads men like Shackleton and Mackintosh to even attempt such foolhardy ventures isn’t lost on Tyler-Lewis. Indeed, it’s hard to imagine an explorer vain enough to attempt truly heroic feats without being so stubborn as to not know when an effort is futile. The Lost Men is as much a story of the clash of monumental egos as it is one of man against nature. Though the story bogs down at points, and though its illustration program isn’t nearly as rich as the illustrated version of the impressive Alfred Lansing chronicle of the Shackleton expedition, Endurance, The Lost Men is, at its best, a gripping tale, riveting enough to satisfy even jaded readers of adventure stories.
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.