The Brooklyn Bridge spans the Hudson River, connecting the New York boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn. When it was completed in 1883 it was the longest suspension bridge in the world—longer than the previous record-holder by fifty percent—and was for many years after that also the world’s tallest structure. The literary symbolism of its neo-Gothic arches soon became as well-trafficked as the bridge itself. It came to represent the majesty of human ingenuity and perseverance, collective aspirations of prosperity in an increasingly disparate New York, the incontrovertible force of modernity, somehow both weighty and supportive. Of course, it also represented materialism in all its glory and ignominy. The image of the unscrupulous shyster angling to sell a piece of riverside property to a gullible yokel eager to own a bit of history is still as visible in our cultural landscape as the bridge itself is in our physical one.
It is apt, then, that Robert Westfield’s first novel, Suspension, uses the Brooklyn Bridge to explore the spectacle of imagination. The bridge serves as a Juliet’s balcony, a place where lovers whisper endearments to each other and to the city lights below. One character attempts a lover’s leap from it, spurned by his lady but embracing the city he once despised. And it is the bridge’s awesome armature and cables that suspend the romance of self invention that is at the heart of both the story and New York City.
Spanning the months preceding and just after September 11, 2001, Suspension follows the quotidian-cum-quixotic life of Andy Green. A question writer for an educational testing service, Andy delights in obscuring the right answers amidst wrong ones; he zealously obscures not for the consternation that it may cause college hopefuls but for the sheer pleasure of construction, the wordplay. Though a witty and attractive man, his life teeters toward the ordinary. In fact, it seems as straightforward and uncomplicated as an un-obscured multiple-choice question.
But there is more amiss than middle-aged ennui. Andy’s mother tried to drown him when he was an infant. His sister is performing lewd acts with her boss in the parking lot of a Petey Pepperoni franchise in suburban Maryland. His friend Sonia Obolensky, a recent Russian émigré and cabaret song stylist, has smuggled a cousin into New York to pose as her double. And his new boyfriend, Brad Willet, a sexy philanthropist who is helping to fulfill the dreams of cabaret singers everywhere, is desperate to keep a dangerous secret, one that threatens to leave Andy in the lurch and the law in hot pursuit. Westfield is wonderful in bringing in exploits, bumbling errors, and zany characters, all of which skew Andy’s life toward the surreal and regale the reader with d) all of the above.
What ensues is a delicious farce replete with mistaken identities, mayhem, and murder afoul. It is an impressive debut: well-written, well-edited, and hopefully, equally well-received. The prose is frugal, yet alight with the wordplay that Andy—and clearly Westfield—so much admires. Early in the book, Andy meets Sonia in a language exchange program, where she is learning English and he is practicing Russian.
“I’ve already noticed that you seem to be overly fond of conjunctions. You tend to begin your sentences with and.”
“No. This is okay. This is no problemo.”
“Actually it is a problem and you should also know that problemo is not English.”
“And my teacher she tells me no problemo.”
“Well, she’s wrong.”
“Nyet. I do not think.”
“She’s adding a Spanish o to the end. It’s fine, it’s just not English.”
“And it’s fine. Yes.”
“No. No, it’s not really fine.”
“And you just say fine.”
“I take it back.”
And although the characters are quirky and charming and the dialogue downright hilarious at times, Westfield’s greatest triumph is in their believability. He achieves this admirably, particularly given how svelte the book is.
Westfield doesn’t take his reader for granted—he takes us for a ride instead. Spry and agile, the book is accomplished because it depends equally on plot and characterization while upending our expectations of both. There is a mystery, one integral to Andy’s development, that is never solved. No deus ex machine or voiceover tidily ushers in the denouement.
Perhaps, though, Westfield’s bravado is most evident in collapse: Andy’s and the Twin Towers’. Westfield neither explains away 9/11 as a presage to war nor elegizes the extraordinary loss. In fact, he strays far from the pathos that much post-traumatic art condescends to: for Andy, the incidents of that day are just that, incidental. A tragedy of his own overshadows: More than a month prior, Andy is ambushed while strolling along Ninth Avenue with his sister’s fiancé, Peter. Although Andy escapes with only minor bodily injuries (Peter is brutally beaten), his psyche is devastated and he holes up in his apartment. Suspecting gay bashing or the magic mafia (Peter is a low-tech magician), he paints his front door canary yellow to blend with the walls, locks his three locks, and survives on delivery, requiring secret passwords from even the mailman.
Andy’s life on the lam gives Westfield room to display an ingenious take on the conventions of farce. We’re treated to the unfolding of Andy’s neuroses from the close, smelly confines of his tiny apartment. Instead of the protagonist embroiling himself in the frenzied action of the drawing room, Andy’s paranoia pulls the frenzy inward. And it is funny, full of mental pratfalls and pathetic antics. When he resurfaces months later to retrieve a package left by his erstwhile boyfriend, the package that he and Peter were set to retrieve the night of the attack, he does not discover the reason for Brad’s flight but rather something altogether unexpected: that someone in a green trench coat is following him.
Andy comprehends that the world has continued without him, even in the wake of incomprehensible disaster. What he failed to understand was how much he missed life and how much he missed of it. Westfield brings this home by ensuring that Andy’s reentry is far from graceful, telescoping the events of his absence so that they bombard him as soon as he steps into the bright sun and harried crowds. It’s a wonderful effect, and it propels the reader along with Andy in a very cinematic way, a la Woody Allen. The pandemonium that he hoped to avoid through his seclusion was only deferred, and now it sings. One might think the song is something suitably operatic, Wagner perhaps. But given the special attention Suspension pays to the American songbook, it’s probably Cole Porter.
It’s challenging to discuss this romp without revealing too much of the plot, but that would ruin the pleasure of reading it. As the book progresses, mysteries are unveiled, each a delightful surprise. Westfield’s achievement is notable: a lithe narrative supported by good craft. With Suspension, like the bridge it pays homage to, it is very easy to suspend your disbelief, to walk the span between ideas imagined and things wrought.
Read more articles by Brien Michael
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.