“The earth is a tightrope; our train speeds across the flat thin wire. They say that a century from now this will all be gone, that the oceans will rise above this threadbare patch of earth. . . . I can’t quite believe this because I never believe anything I won’t be around to see.” So states the narrator of the title story in Rattawut Lapcharoensap’s debut short story collection, Sightseeing, as he and his mother set out on a vacation together, trying to see their own country as tourists. Later he adds, “Above all, Ma and I know that if things were different, if our lives were simply following their ordinary course, we would never have taken the time to notice such sights.”
As a recipe for fiction it seems a little pat to say that hardship leads vision, but in Lapcharoensap’s hands we feel like we are seeing these sights and insights for the first time. The six stories in Sightseeing address familiar situations — fickle teenage love, loss of innocence, intergenerational conflict — but they are jerked out of the ordinary course by the sensitivity of Lapcharoensap’s prose. Fresh and well-crafted, they reinterpret everyday pain and beauty.
In these stories pain and beauty are commonly intertwined, with pain always undercut by a hopeful longing for beauty. The Thailand he shows us is a place of small-town corruption, families wavering on the border between financial security and desperation. A place where winning the next cock fight is crucial, where sewing 200 more bras for export to the West a matter of life and death, where Cambodian refugees ruined the neighborhood and a father died so soon.
Lapsharoensap’s descriptions are sensually rich and emotionally concise. He writes with authority, completely inhabiting his stories from the first sentence. In fact, the often-startling opening lines, such as “The only thing I ever learned about wealth was Priscilla the Cambodian’s beautiful teeth. . . . When she smiled it sometimes looked like that little girl had swallowed the sun,” from “Priscilla the Cambodian” are a real strength of his writing. Provocative on first reading, they gain additional resonance when we return to them after finishing each tale.
One of the best pieces, “At the Café Lovely,” is narrated by a lonely eleven-year-old boy who cleaves onto his older brother Anek after their father’s death. The narrator of outings together in which the two of them will be “pals,” but when Anek finally agrees to take him along on a Saturday night excursion, it is to the dreary Café Lovely where he and his friends huff paint and have sex with prostitutes. Late that night, still high on paint, Anek tells the eleven-year-old he can drive the motorcycle home. As he accelerates faster than he has ever been allowed to go before, speeding along an empty road at seventy miles per hour, then seventy-five, then faster still, “nothing seemed lovelier to me than that hot wind howling in my ears, the night blurring around us, the smell of the engine burning gasoline.” As so often happens in Lapcharoensap’s stories, the narrator’s apparent expression of joy is devastating because, we know that from this moment on his life will accelerate, too, into a desperate nihilism.
Born in 1979, Lapcharoensap is a young writer and it is forgivable if the stories in this, his first collection, at times seem tidy and unwilling to delve into the darkest emotions. Yet, along with its flaws, Sightseeing reveals promise.
The concluding story, “Cockfighter,” is the longest and hints at the writer that Lapcharoensap may become. It tells the story of Ladda, a teenage girl whose father goes from being the town’s top cockfighter to losing everything after he pits his chickens against those of the corrupt leading family. Underneath this story swirl other, less defined narratives of family, community, sexuality, and friendship. There are hints that Ladda”s own budding sexuality is somehow the root cause of her parents’ alienation and the breakdown of civic order. As she comes to recognize both her own power and her total insignificance, we wonder if it is possible for her to grow up without implicating herself into the very same web of love and obligation that ensnared her parents.
The hardcover edition of Sightseeing was released in January 2005, right after many of the communities described in the book were destroyed by the tsunami that hit Southeast Asia on December 26, 2004. Perhaps because of the unprecedented attention the Western media was paying to Thailand just then, hardcover reviews focused on the culture clash with the West and the effects of tourism on the native people. Reviewers from Salon, The Guardian (London), and The New York Times critiqued Lapcharoensap for clumsy or heavy-handed criticism of America.
“At the Café Lovely” and “Farangs” were particularly cited. In the former, the narrator takes a long-awaited bite of his first hamburger in the Western fast food restaurant his brother took him to for his birthday — and then vomits it up. In “Farangs,” (slang for foreigners) the teenage narrator watches Rambo movies, lusts after the American girls, and treasures his pet pig. It’s named Clint Eastwood and it’s the only real gift his American soldier father left behind. It’s not hard to see how reviewers might take such stories as overly obvious shots at the last remaining superpower.
Yet although many things about Sightseeing (including its title) seem to invite such a reading from Western audiences, it is significant that the titular sightseers are actually two Thais exploring their country. Reading the stories a year after the tsunami, the instances of culture clash come across as, first and foremost, explorations of character, not political critique.
To borrow a quote from the title story, “Thailand [is] only a paradise for fools and farangs, for criminals and foreigners.” Lapcharoensap carefully turns this equation around: America might appear to be paradise to a Thai, but that illusion always falls apart under closer scrutiny, just as do the other ideals of love, family, and personal honor. The book isn’t so much an indictment of the West as an exploration of how cultures can misinterpret each other and themselves. Unfortunately, this pain seems necessary: it is only when illusory paradises collapse that Lapcharoensap’s characters can discover the aching beauty of the real world.
Read more articles by Elizabeth Wadell
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.