Shannon: A Poem of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, Campbell McGrath. Ecco. 128pp, $23.00..
Between 1804 and 1806, the thirty-odd members of Merriwether Lewis and William Clark’s Corps of Discovery traveled more than 8,000 miles of terrain in the newly acquired Louisiana Territory. During that time, they met with countless indigenous groups, hunted grizzly bears, endured a long, wet winter on the Oregon coast, and crossed the Rocky Mountains. They also produced a set of journals that—in their raw, unedited glory—comprise one of North America’s unruliest epics. It is a sprawling story that contains few moments of cinematic drama: there are no great battles with the Indians, no moments of revelation akin to Columbus sighting land in the West Indies. Instead, the men collect flora and fauna, relentlessly chart the geography, and puzzle over the baffling arena of international relations into which they have stepped. Like the journey itself, the journals of the Lewis and Clark expedition are a vast continent of strange wonder—almost too large to be compassed.
In Shannon: A Poem of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, Campbell McGrath manages to distill the power of those sprawling documents by filling in just one of their many lacunae. As the Corps ascended the Missouri river on its journey west, Private George Shannon was detailed to retrieve several horses that had wandered off. He did so, but in the process he became lost. For sixteen days he traveled alone on the Plains, quickly running out of provisions and ammunition. The problem was simple: Shannon believed that he was traveling behind the expedition, when in fact he was actually ahead of it. When, through sheer good luck, Shannon was finally reunited with his comrades, Clark noted that he had nearly “starved to death in a land of plenty for the want of bullets or something to kill his meat.”
Shannon, a single narrative poem bracketed by entries from Clark’s journals, tells the story of what befell its eponymous protagonist during this time. McGrath has a strong sense of the world—physical, social, and intellectual—of the early republic that would have shaped Shannon, and the verse becomes both the unwritten record that Shannon did not keep and the interior monologue that he would never had dared to record.
Dog-tired from driving the horses all day
The brown one especially
Being contrary and prone to lurch & stumble
Yet is my sleep postponed
By these prolific showers of shooting stars
Blazing their luminary trails across the heavens.
Much is writ in their countenance
But not the destiny of men or such trifles.
It is difficult to do justice to Shannon through brief quotations, because the power of the poem—like the expedition and its written record—is cumulative. Shannon observes the landscape, wonders when he will find the rest of his fellow travelers, and schemes about ways to kill game. “Thoughts & reflections flow through me here / Alone in these lands,” Shannon declares. But these are not the musings of a Thoreavian prototype. McGrath treads lightly on philosophy and existential angst and instead turns to something both more modest and stronger, a kind of wry truth wrung out from the dirty rags of Shannon’s wandering. When a starving Shannon finally turns to grasshoppers for his supper, his lament comes in a minor key: “There is no salvation / In them oily bugs.”
Shannon, in fact, looks backward, to the east, as much as he looks forward to the Rocky Mountains or the Pacific Ocean. He recalls the death of his brother and wonders about its place in the divine plan. He ponders the soft breasts of the girl he has left behind. And he remembers the pithy advice of his father. (“George my boy / Education wears many uniforms.”) He also wonders about the American Indians in whose domain he travels. Shannon does not directly encounter any of them during his sixteen-day sojourn—McGrath mercifully skips the Dances with Wolves opportunities—but he does ruminate on the encounters that the expedition has already experienced and the ultimate fate of the original tenants of the land. He wishes that they might embrace the rule of United States law but also questions “why they would trouble to.” If Shannon is a sympathetic observer of Indians, in other words, he also shares the belief of his countrymen in what later generations would call Manifest Destiny:
These wild, wind-torn lands flung to the horizon
Will soon enough be states
Of the Union
Why else fashion a Corps of Discovery?
The real burden of Shannon, though, is to name what exactly is being discovered here. McGrath is alive to the way in which the republican ideals that underpinned the Lewis and Clark expedition—and motivated its author, Thomas Jefferson—rarely matched the lived reality. But George Shannon is not a heretic; he has not come to the wilderness to topple false gods. “The Law does not abide in the grass / Or the plum, it does not adhere / To them as the dewdrop does. / It must be imagined.” One of McGrath’s achievements in this poem is to show how Shannon searches in vain for an adequate screen onto which he can project an imagination of spiritual plentitude. He cannot find it in the landscape itself, “Too large in both emptiness and fullness.” He cannot find it in the mysterious Indians whom he has met, men and women scarred by disease and their own history of warfare, and he cannot find it in his own experience.
So instead of Shannon discovering the land, the land discovers George Shannon. He is surrounded by herds of buffalo in the dark—covered by crawling ants at dawn. These sections of the poem are some of the most affecting in the book, but their emotional weight comes from the McGrath’s careful restraint:
hump-rumble, herd wallow, gruff in the darkness
buffalo breathing in the dawn all around me
smell of the buffalo strong on the river breeze
black eyes wide as the Western Ocean
great herds of the buffalo all around me
What happens to Shannon in the close of the poem is both moving and subtle, and to describe it in detail would be to give away too much of the climax of McGrath’s narrative. The jacket copy of Shannon describes it as an “epic,” but that term might be misleading about the emotional palette with which McGrath works. He is after something both smaller and grander in Shannon, the kind of complicated shifts in perspective that reorient our world by degrees rather than upending it by revolution. “On a journey of discovery / I am the lost,” Shannon proclaims. But what is found is something elusive, nearly impossible to name.
Shannon will not overturn either of the dominant images of the Lewis and Clark expedition—the grand pioneers or the imperialistic despoilers—that currently circulate in the American imagination. But it is nevertheless a more profound meditation than most of what passes for historical revisionism. The America that George Shannon explores in this book is not a wilderness ripe for redemption or trophy to be stolen away. It is briar patch whose thorns sometimes arrange themselves in patterns of unexpected grace. It is unwieldy, prickly, and daunting. Sometimes you chase the buffalo. Sometimes the buffalo chase you.
Michael A. Elliott is associate professor of English at Emory University. He is the author of Custerology: The Enduring Legacy of the Indian Wars and George Armstrong Custer and The Culture Concept: Writing and Difference in the Age of Realism and coeditor of American Literary Studies: A Methodological Reader.
Andrew Seal argues that “Chicago and New York are to U.S. fiction what Tolstoy and Dostoevsky are to the Russians. Sorry, Boston. Sorry, L.A. Sorry, D.C. Sorry, San Fran. Sorry, the South. You have your claims, no doubt, but they are as the claims of Pushkin, Lermontov, Chekhov, or Gogol.” Discuss.
Phelan goes on to say, "There will, I’m sure, be no consensus about what constitutes badness or whether it belongs to the book, the reader, the situation of reading, all of the above, or none of the above," though he's almost wrong there. The list is pretty varied, from the morally-bankrupt to the so-bad-it's-good varieties, though generally the harshest judgments come against fussy stylists and purple prose. Cormac McCarthy gets singled out, by name and illustration, multiple times.
Wherein we learn that Imperial hasn’t gotten nearly the attention it deserves and “Vollmann was exceptionally gracious as both host and interview subject, quite generous with his whiskey and his time.”
In some of the best news ever, Margaret Atwood is going to have a cameo in a movie musical about hockey. Seriously. I am — what is the word? – giddy. Don’t believe me? Atwood discusses it on her blog. Can this news get better? Hell, yes. The movie also stars Olivia Newton-John.
New issue of the New York Review of Books is out, with Colm Tóibín on exile lit.
With jokes from Joyce Carol Oates and "wild imaginings" from 92-year-old winner Diana Athill -- not to mention talk of a sequel from "Wolf Hall" author Hilary Mantel -- this year's NBCC Awards were noteworthy for their celebration of literature by women.
DFW's latest cover makeover, plus a great-looking cover and a really not-so-great-looking cover.
Since buying The Selected Poems of Wallace Stevens at City Lights, I’ve been rereading many Stevens poems and trying to understand it from a more mature perspective. Last time I read a vast amount of Stevens was when I was 22 for a class on Stevens, T.S. Eliot, Yeats, and Marianne Moore. With fifteen years [...]
The 2010 Best Translated Book Awards were announced last night at Idlewild Books, Manhattan. The Confessions of Noa Weber by Gail Hareven, translated by Dalya Bilu won the fiction award, and the poetry award went to Elena Fanailova for The Russian Version, translated from the Russian by Genya Turovskaya and Stephanie Sandler. Check out the [...]
The National Book Critics Circle Award is announcing their winners tonight. The diversity of their nominations, from the better known (such as Hilary Mantel and Mary Karr) to the less mainstream (such as Rachel Zucker and Eula Biss), makes the blog entries on the nominees an interesting read. I added Stephen Burt’s Close Calls with [...]
Lipsyte: Well these were the famous classes that he taught and others have written about it. He would kind of perform an amazing monologue for hours that would be a work of art in and of itself, in the way it was constructed in real time and kept pulling threads through and weaving all these elements together, but the content of it would be reflections on writing and art and what it is to be an artist and how one should approach the page. And then at the end of that—and that could go for four or five hours—at the end of that, he would call on students to read from whatever it was they were working on, but normally you wouldn't get too far, because he would stop you probably within a sentence or two and point out all that was false in what you had perpetrated.
In the brief essay that J.C. Hallman will deliver at a panel discussion at the 2010 AWP Conference in Denver, Hallman will offer up his own insights as to the nature of this admittedly flawed practice. The essay will be, to some extent, experimental. It will have a self-referential quality, it will aspire to innovation, indeed it will even be accurate to describe it as "meta-," but of course Hallman will use none of these terms, though he would like to. Book proposals are not places for words like innovation and experimentation. Instead, Hallman's essay will be "quirky and fun."
Seven Nights Jorge Luis Borges (trans. Eliot Weinberger). New Directions. $12.95, 128pp. In Seven Nights, the recently re-released collection of lectures-turned-essays originally given in Buenos Aires in 1977, Borges does not discuss the phenomenon of déjà vu. He does, however, speak at great length about nightmares and dreams, which he describes as “a kind of modest [...]
Best European Fiction 2010 edited by Aleksandar Hemon, preface by Zadie Smith. Dalkey Archive Press.448 pp, $15.95. “The great pest of speech is frequency of translation,” Samuel Johnson once wrote, in the preface to his iconic Dictionary of the English Language: No book was ever turned from one language into another without imparting something of its native [...]
“There are, of course, newspapers to keep responsible Americans up to date when trouble looms, and public television or even the History Channel to inform us about the occasional historic battle or archaeological discovery or civil war. What else do we need?” Claudia Roth Pierpont frames her essay on the contemporary Arabic novel, published in [...]