Riding Toward Everywhere, William T. Vollmann. Harper Perennial. 288pp, $14.99.
Riding Toward Everywhere, this year’s new book from the prolific William T. Vollmann, is a nonfiction account of his adventures hopping freight trains and trying out the hobo lifestyle as a person lurking “literally and figuratively in the shadows.” His traveling companion is a late middle-aged man named Steve who seems to have been riding the trains for “sport” (Vollmann’s term) since college. Steve is the “traincar-finder and [Vollmann] the people-pleaser.”
If you’re at all familiar with Vollmann’s work you know that he can talk to anyone about anything, and Steve usually opts to run to the liquor store while Vollmann stays behind and hangs out drinking with bums, of whom they only meet a few, treating them with his usual compassion and non-judgmental attitude. We get little information about Steve himself, though. Whether this was at Steve’s request is unclear, but what is clear is that he’s married, has kids, is an expert at the sport (or as close to an expert as one can be; Vollmann insists that no one is ever an expert at riding the rails), and often flies out of cities he’s found himself stuck in, and that he’s respectful of the boxcars and the trains, never urinating in them or leaving trash behind.
Vollmann wrote about trainhopping toward the end of his massive 2000 novel The Royal Family, and while these two texts are very dissimilar in their subject matter and narrative structure, Vollmann’s still working in his instantly-recognizable style: in one of his inimitable similes he tells us that “Tree silhouettes against white sky, pallid sky, dim grass, houselights, the tremendous clatter of existence, these things brought me happiness as crystal-clear as a vegetarian girl’s urine.” His writing style always reveals as much about himself as it does about his subjects, and something we learn about him from this work is that his father is very much against all of Vollmann’s travels—he doesn’t understand why he needed to go fight in Afghanistan (in An Afghanistan Picture Show), or went to the north magnetic pole (The Rifles), or why he now illegally boards trains for fun, for the sake of adventure.
In the beginning Vollmann thinks he’s going to have wild adventures, as he sees signs pointing to a mysterious trainhopping hobo gang known as the FTRA, a gang very psychotic and violent according to the rumors he hears from the few people he comes across willing to talk about them. (We learn that the gang is the Freight Train Riders of America, and people are very afraid of them.) He sees their graffiti amongst hobo tags, racist slogans, and depictions of female anatomy that decorate the walls of the boxcars and the areas where he and Steve hide to wait for trains to come. He’s expecting some element of danger, but he never quite finds it and is somewhat disappointed, as he recounts late in the book:
I had expected my travels to be picaresque, teeming with wise, bizarre or menacing outlaw characters. At the very least, I had imagined that without really trying I would meet dozens of people of Pittsburgh Ed’s sterling caliber. In fact my various odysseys were haunted by absence, with only here and there a few lost voices such as Cinders’s or Ed’s singing about the way things used to be back then, as if they were crickets who had inexplicably outlived their summer.
This disappointment is an encapsulation of his resounding disenchantment with the direction America is moving under George W. Bush, a direction he equates with an increase in airport security wherein one is expected to prove that one’s “American enough” to fly. All this is paralleled with a decline in hoboes hopping freight trains, something which Vollmann clearly sees as a mythic American activity akin to Johnny Appleseed and baseball.
It’s a parallel which only really starts coming together late in a book that Vollmann himself seems to have little faith in; as he says, “My critique of American society remains fundamentally incoherent,” and “If I make this point too often for your taste, I apologize; this book has few points to make.” In fact, this book, like riding the rails, seems to have no real point other than the doing/writing/reading it; or as Vollmann says, “Above all, how luxurious it is to travel I care not where for no good reason!” Vollmann often chooses destinations based on the fact that he has no reason whatsoever to go there, and sums up the thrill and excitement of hopping freight trains thusly: “When I hitchhike, I experience the same feeling.”
Riding Toward Everywhere isn’t Vollmann’s best book, partially because of the lack of “wise, bizarre, or menacing outlaw characters” and picaresque travels, and partially because, although nothing terribly much happens in the book, we’re left with a lot that’s unexplored: What does Steve do for a living? How is he able to reconcile this hobby with his normal life? How did Steve and Vollmann meet? What do the different types of train cars look like? How do you use a railroad spike to hold the doors open? What about the hobo tags? What do they mean?1
It seems that a lot of the basic terms and practices of riding the rails were taken for granted, and despite being given the usual-for-Vollmann sixty pages of sources and photographs, there’s no glossary. The book’s easy enough to follow, and it’s not like it’s written in jargon, but I think a few of these basic clues for the reader—like a diagram of each type of train car—would have proven useful for us non-trainhoppers.
More than anything though, the book’s just not terribly interesting. It’s well-written but it feels like Vollmann has some difficulty communicating what must be the sheer excitement of trainhopping. In Rising Up and Rising Down, or even in fictional works like Whores for Gloria, Argall, or the aforementioned The Royal Family, there’s a sense of urgency that comes across in Vollmann’s love and passion for his subjects that’s absent from this book. The photographs in the back are lovely, and there are a lot of them (the photos and back matter comprise a quarter of the book), but they might have been more helpful interspersed throughout the text (like in Rising Up and Rising Down) than collected in the back. Riding Toward Everywhere is a pretty book, but with not a lot going on narratively, it’s one of Vollmann’s minor works.
____
1 He reproduces them and partially deciphers them, but as they seemed layered with each hobo’s history, it would be interesting to know what each phrase/number/grouping stands for.
Scott Bryan Wilson is a frequent contributor to The Quarterly Conversation.
Read more articles by Scott Bryan Wilson
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.