Riding Toward Everywhere, William T. Vollmann. Harper Perennial. 288pp, $14.99.
Riding Toward Everywhere, this year’s new book from the prolific William T. Vollmann, is a nonfiction account of his adventures hopping freight trains and trying out the hobo lifestyle as a person lurking “literally and figuratively in the shadows.” His traveling companion is a late middle-aged man named Steve who seems to have been riding the trains for “sport” (Vollmann’s term) since college. Steve is the “traincar-finder and [Vollmann] the people-pleaser.”
If you’re at all familiar with Vollmann’s work you know that he can talk to anyone about anything, and Steve usually opts to run to the liquor store while Vollmann stays behind and hangs out drinking with bums, of whom they only meet a few, treating them with his usual compassion and non-judgmental attitude. We get little information about Steve himself, though. Whether this was at Steve’s request is unclear, but what is clear is that he’s married, has kids, is an expert at the sport (or as close to an expert as one can be; Vollmann insists that no one is ever an expert at riding the rails), and often flies out of cities he’s found himself stuck in, and that he’s respectful of the boxcars and the trains, never urinating in them or leaving trash behind.
Vollmann wrote about trainhopping toward the end of his massive 2000 novel The Royal Family, and while these two texts are very dissimilar in their subject matter and narrative structure, Vollmann’s still working in his instantly-recognizable style: in one of his inimitable similes he tells us that “Tree silhouettes against white sky, pallid sky, dim grass, houselights, the tremendous clatter of existence, these things brought me happiness as crystal-clear as a vegetarian girl’s urine.” His writing style always reveals as much about himself as it does about his subjects, and something we learn about him from this work is that his father is very much against all of Vollmann’s travels—he doesn’t understand why he needed to go fight in Afghanistan (in An Afghanistan Picture Show), or went to the north magnetic pole (The Rifles), or why he now illegally boards trains for fun, for the sake of adventure.
In the beginning Vollmann thinks he’s going to have wild adventures, as he sees signs pointing to a mysterious trainhopping hobo gang known as the FTRA, a gang very psychotic and violent according to the rumors he hears from the few people he comes across willing to talk about them. (We learn that the gang is the Freight Train Riders of America, and people are very afraid of them.) He sees their graffiti amongst hobo tags, racist slogans, and depictions of female anatomy that decorate the walls of the boxcars and the areas where he and Steve hide to wait for trains to come. He’s expecting some element of danger, but he never quite finds it and is somewhat disappointed, as he recounts late in the book:
I had expected my travels to be picaresque, teeming with wise, bizarre or menacing outlaw characters. At the very least, I had imagined that without really trying I would meet dozens of people of Pittsburgh Ed’s sterling caliber. In fact my various odysseys were haunted by absence, with only here and there a few lost voices such as Cinders’s or Ed’s singing about the way things used to be back then, as if they were crickets who had inexplicably outlived their summer.
This disappointment is an encapsulation of his resounding disenchantment with the direction America is moving under George W. Bush, a direction he equates with an increase in airport security wherein one is expected to prove that one’s “American enough” to fly. All this is paralleled with a decline in hoboes hopping freight trains, something which Vollmann clearly sees as a mythic American activity akin to Johnny Appleseed and baseball.
It’s a parallel which only really starts coming together late in a book that Vollmann himself seems to have little faith in; as he says, “My critique of American society remains fundamentally incoherent,” and “If I make this point too often for your taste, I apologize; this book has few points to make.” In fact, this book, like riding the rails, seems to have no real point other than the doing/writing/reading it; or as Vollmann says, “Above all, how luxurious it is to travel I care not where for no good reason!” Vollmann often chooses destinations based on the fact that he has no reason whatsoever to go there, and sums up the thrill and excitement of hopping freight trains thusly: “When I hitchhike, I experience the same feeling.”
Riding Toward Everywhere isn’t Vollmann’s best book, partially because of the lack of “wise, bizarre, or menacing outlaw characters” and picaresque travels, and partially because, although nothing terribly much happens in the book, we’re left with a lot that’s unexplored: What does Steve do for a living? How is he able to reconcile this hobby with his normal life? How did Steve and Vollmann meet? What do the different types of train cars look like? How do you use a railroad spike to hold the doors open? What about the hobo tags? What do they mean?1
It seems that a lot of the basic terms and practices of riding the rails were taken for granted, and despite being given the usual-for-Vollmann sixty pages of sources and photographs, there’s no glossary. The book’s easy enough to follow, and it’s not like it’s written in jargon, but I think a few of these basic clues for the reader—like a diagram of each type of train car—would have proven useful for us non-trainhoppers.
More than anything though, the book’s just not terribly interesting. It’s well-written but it feels like Vollmann has some difficulty communicating what must be the sheer excitement of trainhopping. In Rising Up and Rising Down, or even in fictional works like Whores for Gloria, Argall, or the aforementioned The Royal Family, there’s a sense of urgency that comes across in Vollmann’s love and passion for his subjects that’s absent from this book. The photographs in the back are lovely, and there are a lot of them (the photos and back matter comprise a quarter of the book), but they might have been more helpful interspersed throughout the text (like in Rising Up and Rising Down) than collected in the back. Riding Toward Everywhere is a pretty book, but with not a lot going on narratively, it’s one of Vollmann’s minor works.
____
1 He reproduces them and partially deciphers them, but as they seemed layered with each hobo’s history, it would be interesting to know what each phrase/number/grouping stands for.
Scott Bryan Wilson is a frequent contributor to The Quarterly Conversation.
Read more articles by Scott Bryan Wilson
Andrew Seal argues that “Chicago and New York are to U.S. fiction what Tolstoy and Dostoevsky are to the Russians. Sorry, Boston. Sorry, L.A. Sorry, D.C. Sorry, San Fran. Sorry, the South. You have your claims, no doubt, but they are as the claims of Pushkin, Lermontov, Chekhov, or Gogol.” Discuss.
Phelan goes on to say, "There will, I’m sure, be no consensus about what constitutes badness or whether it belongs to the book, the reader, the situation of reading, all of the above, or none of the above," though he's almost wrong there. The list is pretty varied, from the morally-bankrupt to the so-bad-it's-good varieties, though generally the harshest judgments come against fussy stylists and purple prose. Cormac McCarthy gets singled out, by name and illustration, multiple times.
Wherein we learn that Imperial hasn’t gotten nearly the attention it deserves and “Vollmann was exceptionally gracious as both host and interview subject, quite generous with his whiskey and his time.”
In some of the best news ever, Margaret Atwood is going to have a cameo in a movie musical about hockey. Seriously. I am — what is the word? – giddy. Don’t believe me? Atwood discusses it on her blog. Can this news get better? Hell, yes. The movie also stars Olivia Newton-John.
New issue of the New York Review of Books is out, with Colm Tóibín on exile lit.
With jokes from Joyce Carol Oates and "wild imaginings" from 92-year-old winner Diana Athill -- not to mention talk of a sequel from "Wolf Hall" author Hilary Mantel -- this year's NBCC Awards were noteworthy for their celebration of literature by women.
DFW's latest cover makeover, plus a great-looking cover and a really not-so-great-looking cover.
Since buying The Selected Poems of Wallace Stevens at City Lights, I’ve been rereading many Stevens poems and trying to understand it from a more mature perspective. Last time I read a vast amount of Stevens was when I was 22 for a class on Stevens, T.S. Eliot, Yeats, and Marianne Moore. With fifteen years [...]
The 2010 Best Translated Book Awards were announced last night at Idlewild Books, Manhattan. The Confessions of Noa Weber by Gail Hareven, translated by Dalya Bilu won the fiction award, and the poetry award went to Elena Fanailova for The Russian Version, translated from the Russian by Genya Turovskaya and Stephanie Sandler. Check out the [...]
The National Book Critics Circle Award is announcing their winners tonight. The diversity of their nominations, from the better known (such as Hilary Mantel and Mary Karr) to the less mainstream (such as Rachel Zucker and Eula Biss), makes the blog entries on the nominees an interesting read. I added Stephen Burt’s Close Calls with [...]
Lipsyte: Well these were the famous classes that he taught and others have written about it. He would kind of perform an amazing monologue for hours that would be a work of art in and of itself, in the way it was constructed in real time and kept pulling threads through and weaving all these elements together, but the content of it would be reflections on writing and art and what it is to be an artist and how one should approach the page. And then at the end of that—and that could go for four or five hours—at the end of that, he would call on students to read from whatever it was they were working on, but normally you wouldn't get too far, because he would stop you probably within a sentence or two and point out all that was false in what you had perpetrated.
In the brief essay that J.C. Hallman will deliver at a panel discussion at the 2010 AWP Conference in Denver, Hallman will offer up his own insights as to the nature of this admittedly flawed practice. The essay will be, to some extent, experimental. It will have a self-referential quality, it will aspire to innovation, indeed it will even be accurate to describe it as "meta-," but of course Hallman will use none of these terms, though he would like to. Book proposals are not places for words like innovation and experimentation. Instead, Hallman's essay will be "quirky and fun."
Seven Nights Jorge Luis Borges (trans. Eliot Weinberger). New Directions. $12.95, 128pp. In Seven Nights, the recently re-released collection of lectures-turned-essays originally given in Buenos Aires in 1977, Borges does not discuss the phenomenon of déjà vu. He does, however, speak at great length about nightmares and dreams, which he describes as “a kind of modest [...]
Best European Fiction 2010 edited by Aleksandar Hemon, preface by Zadie Smith. Dalkey Archive Press.448 pp, $15.95. “The great pest of speech is frequency of translation,” Samuel Johnson once wrote, in the preface to his iconic Dictionary of the English Language: No book was ever turned from one language into another without imparting something of its native [...]
“There are, of course, newspapers to keep responsible Americans up to date when trouble looms, and public television or even the History Channel to inform us about the occasional historic battle or archaeological discovery or civil war. What else do we need?” Claudia Roth Pierpont frames her essay on the contemporary Arabic novel, published in [...]