Ray of the Star, Laird Hunt. Coffee House Press. 192pp, $14.95.
Ray of the Star opens with two nods in the direction of French writer Georges Perec. The first, a quotation from his 1967 novel A Man Asleep, serves as entry to the story: Now you must learn how to last. A man named Harry has suffered the unexpected deaths of some people, likely family members, about whom he cares very much. The narrative jumps ahead an unspecified amount of time to Harry abandoning his home, his job, everything. He’s running away from everything with nowhere to go. Like the protagonist of A Man Asleep, this is a man realizing he no longer knows how to live—all that is left now is learning how to last.
Harry—seemingly at random, though of course it will turn out later that it isn’t—chooses to fly to a foreign city pictured on a postcard he received years ago, before the accident. He bounces between various encounters and digressions, finding himself drawn into a labyrinth of relationships and potential danger. Hunt reveals Harry as someone confused about his state of mind—”as he continued his daily wanderings he realized 1) that given the level of sustained autoanalysis he was engaged in and no matter how much he might in his self-pitying, aspire to it, ‘mad’ was probably inaccurate and that 2) well, there was no 2) but there might be, and that was something”—and only vaguely aware of his probable post-traumatic stress disorder.
Though the individual scenes of this book are written in a way that suggests a relevance to Harry’s larger story, they also come across as digressions, one of those “wasn’t that strange” moments that can come to an individual in a foreign environment and in times of extreme suggestibility. Hunt uses this style of extreme digression to give the reader a sense of the state of Harry’s mind without resorting to more blunt descriptions. Thus the descriptions circle around their targets like a chalk outline at a crime scene: the reader is left with all the details around horrific acts and nearly unbearable emotions, leaving those blank spaces all the more stirring for not being pinned down by an attempt to quantify them. They are chalk outlines as Picasso might have drawn them.
As with Hunt’s previous novel, The Exquisite, the story curves and winds through various fantastic scenes, with the reader’s attention being drawn to oddities both for amusing and chilling effect. Life at this point clearly doesn’t make a great deal of sense for Harry, and so the narrator is compelled to tell Harry’s story as a fairy tale. Surprisingly, though, Hunt’s approach often offers us realistic details and inner workings: for instance, while taking a stab at being a “living statue” street performer, Harry (who, suggestively, is posing as Don Quixote) strikes up a conversation with a centaur:
It was only when Alfonso, speaking over his own mug of coffee, said, “I have something to show you,” that Harry remembered what it was he had planned to say as soon as he arrived—”There are several things I’d like to ask you, Mr. Centaur,” —but instead he found himself murmuring, “It’s very dark out,” and following Alfonso to the far side of the room, and through a narrow blue door that gave onto what it took Harry a moment to realize was a garage of sorts, perhaps even—the stone seemed weathered enough—an old carriage house, in the center of which sat a large yellow submarine, more or less the one The Beatles had had their adventure in, the one that had been so useful in the struggle against the blue meanies, the one connected to the song, which he had never liked very much and which now raged very nearly out of control in his head before subsiding, slightly, then more fully, like someone had thrown a fade switch, “You can get inside it,” Alfonso said,
“It’s the yellow submarine,” Harry said,
“A model, made of chicken wire and paper mache, but a good one,”
“The song . . .” Harry said,
“It goes away, I should know, I live with the thing,”
Each of the chapters continues with the same structure as above—that is, each chapter is composed in the form of just one sentence. Hunt’s technique is neither off-putting nor difficult; what it achieves is to propel the story forward in a way that gives Hunt unusual control over at what moments of the story the reader pauses.
In Ray of the Star Hunt presents lot of ideas at odds with each other. Some of the shifts of character pivot on these characters experiencing similar sentiments and emotions at the same time, and the limits of any shared experience lend the story emotional weight. It’s a difficult trick, to write about the ways in which our traumas can overlap with each other without avoiding the maudlin or resorting to platitudes and remarkable coincidences. Stephen Dixon made it work in his novel Interstate; he took a similar starting point (the experiences that follow having your children die before you) and wrote multiple “takes” of the scenes that follow that moment—ultimately, the reader gets to experiences a sort of nightmare version of the movie Groundhog Day.
By contrast Ray of the Star follows just one “telling” of the fallout from a great loss, but rather than throwing the shit at the fan and then diagramming where it splatters, Hunt wants us to inhabit the trauma. When you’re watching a father’s anguish, you’re seeing the suffering; when you’ve got a narrative like this, where there’s equal measure of uncertainty and “would that really happen?” moments, it hews closer to the chaos of living through that trauma. Rather than reading about Harry’s journey, the reader feels a part of the story, like a ghost hovering around the proceedings.
It’s not all tragedy repercussions. Harry and Solange—the silver woman—fall for each other while being pushed around the city together, lying down inside the yellow submarine. There’s no question that Hunt is taking a risk; it’s a narrow line between the bizarre and a quirky cleverness, but Hunt walks it well. The comedic asides and quirky moments work to leaven the sorrow in a way that both provides relief and simultaneously amplifies the sadness. Meanwhile, Hunt is insidiously upping the ante with a suspense that reaches a scene (no spoilers here) that provided this reader with a genuine, full-on shiver of alarm. The final third of the book moves from that scene into a level of suspense that can only come from a heartfelt investment in the characters; that this book brings the reader to that suspense covertly, in defiance of genre and stereotype, make Ray of the Star another strong work from one of our most creative writers.
Matthew Tiffany is a mental health clinician. His book reviews have appeared in The Quarterly Conversation, PopMatters, Small Spiral Notebook, AudioFile Magazine, and others. He blogs at Condalmo.
Read more articles by Matthew Tiffany
Read more articles about books from Coffee House Press
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.