Post Office, Charles Bukowski. Ecco. 208pp, $13.95.
The mythology of the man swirls thick and fast around Charles Bukowski, an author whose lasting influence on the literary zeitgeist remains impermeably splashed like spilled dregs of Carlo Rossi. Apocryphal legends abound regarding Bukowski the drinker, Bukowski the womanizer, Bukowski the belligerent, Bukowski the unexpectedly tender-hearted. What is perhaps most striking about these legends is that, among the many titles bestowed upon a man with over 40 published books to his name, that of “working stiff” is rarely invoked. It’s undeniably more glamorous to imagine our heroes drowning in whiskey and women than parked for eight hours a day in front of the typewriter, but it is precisely that unglamorous discipline from which books are born, and precisely that unglamorous discipline, plus the attendant drinking, womanizing, belligerence, and tenderness, that gave rise to Bukowski’s first novel, Post Office.
“I have one of two choices—stay in the post office and go crazy . . . or stay out here and play at writer and starve. I have decided to starve.” With these infamous words, Bukowski quit the post office for good at the age of 49 (reportedly just before he was due to be dismissed), and wrote his first novel within a month. Aided by a small monthly stipend from Black Sparrow Press, and further fueled by his intense desire for the fame which would vindicate his toil, Bukowski developed a tireless devotion to the typewriter that was as formidable as it was fruitful. As Howard Sounes observes in his Bukowski biography, Locked in the Arms of a Crazy Life, after working a full shift in the post office as a trainee distribution clerk, Bukowski would go back to his rooming house to drink and type all evening until the other tenants complained about the noise, at which point he’d switch to hand-printing until late in the night. When submitting to editors such as Jon Webb of Loujon Press and John Bryan of Notes from Underground magazine, he sent cartons, not mere envelopes, overflowing with original material.

However, it’s Bukowski’s other excesses that dominate the autobiographical tone of Post Office, a book that helped establish his reputation as an anti-authoritarian proto-slacker just as Tropic of Capricorn, set in part in the “Cosmodemonic Telegraph Company” (Western Union), did for Henry Miller. But unlike Miller’s base yet overtly verbose internal monologues, Bukowski’s spare and direct observations ring entirely unaffected.
From the opening line: “It began as a mistake,” Bukowski, as alter-ego Henry Chinaski, writes straight from the hip in unambiguous, accessible prose. A congenital loser trapped in a dead-end profession from which he can derive no personal satisfaction, yet possessed of enough self-awareness to recognize the absurdity of his situation, Chinaski is an Everyman of the underclass. By turns insincerely servile and unrepentantly sarcastic, he constantly chafes under the seemingly unnecessary regulations imposed on him at the post office and delights in the all-too-rare occasions where he is able to get the better of a superior by delivering the last word. His slyly humorous on-the-job exploits with desperate housewives, fierce dogs, sore muscles, and endless sheets of rain are interspersed with moments of the very real frustrations of an adjunct at the mercy of circumstances against which he seldom has recourse: the sadistic spite of Jonstone (aka “the soup”) who delights in doling out physically impossible workloads and written warnings to his team of beleaguered substitute carriers, the dogged subservience of the other subs who “made Jonstone possible by obeying his impossible orders,” the slow-grinding irritations, both mental:
Old ladies standing in halls, up and down the streets, asking the same question as if they were one person with one voice:
“Mailman, you got any mail for me?”
And you felt like screaming, “Lady, how the hell do I know who you are or I am or anybody is?”
and physical:
It was the stool and the same motion and the same talk. And there I was, dizzy spells and pains in the arms, neck, chest, everywhere. I slept all day resting up for the job. On weekends I had to drink in order to forget it . . .
In just under 200 pages broken into 87 micro-chapters, Post Office manages to convey the not-so-quiet desperation of three separate post-office stints totaling some 14 years, plus a winning streak with the horses, a string of failed relationships with beautiful and broken women, a marriage, a funeral, and the birth of Bukowski’s first and only child. Without resorting to ideological posturing, the maligned mailman simultaneously champions and skewers the proletariat by evoking a life measured out, not in fey teaspoons but in fifths of liquor, 12-hour shifts, petty office politics, imperfect fidelity, and racing forms. He observes the slow decline of his co-workers—GG “the dedicated man” who suffers a nervous breakdown over a bundle of laundry soap coupons, Jimmy Potts, once “a well-built guy in a white T-shirt” grown stooped and weary, “too tired to get a haircut”—and realizes that he himself, after eleven years at the same job, “didn’t have a dime more in my pocket than when I had first walked in.”

Illuminating the schism between “work” and “after-hours” that so often characterizes the lives of an industrialized labor-force, Bukowski mines his protagonist’s downtime for some of his most memorable moments. Whether dodging flowerpots in the marital bed, arranging the funeral of an old lover, winning (and losing) at the racetrack, or celebrating the birth of his daughter (“a major improvement”), the territory of Chinaski’s personal life is as rich as it is raucous. His self-image is constructed mainly from the juicier elements of Bukowski’s own reputation—drinker, lover, fighter, gambler. If he considers his work at all it is to stigmatize it: “Any damn fool can beg up some kind of job; it takes a wise man to make it without working.” He is continually eluded by the presumptive reward for a job well done (the “dedication to service” mentioned by senior carriers), while the “security” of his position as a government employee equally fails to impress him.
Security? You could get security in jail. Three squares and no rent to pay, no utilities, no income tax, no child support. No license plate fees. No traffic tickets. No drunk driving raps. No losses at the race track. Free medical attention. . . . Free burial.
Finally, facing dismissal for chronic absenteeism, Chinaski beats the post office to the punch and voluntarily resigns—an uncharacteristically definitive act for a player in a tale of hardscrabble woe. One of the early progenitors of “dirty realism,” Bukowski himself might have once scoffed at the unlikely literary event of a career drunk chucking in his career work “eight months from (his) 50th birthday,” but having accomplished the same trick himself just weeks earlier, he is able to impart a sense of reality to the scenario. After likening his escape from drudgery to the unexpected freedom enjoyed by previously caged birds, Chinaski acknowledges that he is in for a case of “a particular type of bends.” As much as he has railed against the regimentation of the post office over 14 years, it still represented the single most stable thing in his life.
“I got drunker and stayed drunker than a shit skunk in Purgatory. I even had the butcher knife against my throat one night in the kitchen and then I thought, easy, old boy, your little girl might want you to take her to the zoo . . . ” Like his creator, Chinaski survives his self-destructive urge and emerges from his shock ready to put his newly minted liberty to creative use. The last lines of Post Office, as characteristically unsentimental and terse as those in the beginning, downplay the monumental nature of this life-affirming moment:
In the morning it was morning and I was still alive.
Maybe I’ll write a novel, I thought.
And then I did.
A gambler with a love for a long shot, Chinaski/Bukowski bets on himself to win at independence. And beats the odds.
Nicole Gluckstern is a writer living in San Francisco. She is a frequent contributor to the San Francisco Bay Guardian and a contributing editor of Other magazine.
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.