Pim & Francie: The Golden Bear Days (Artifacts and Bone Fragments) Al Columbia. Fantagraphics. $28.99, 240pp.
Al Columbia’s reputation in the comics world is immense, despite his relatively tiny amount of published work: three comic books and a few contributions to comics anthologies—probably no more than 200 pages total (not including the excellent comic The Pogostick, which Columbia wrote but did not illustrate). His has been a sparse output, with long periods between publication, a writer sought after by fans trying to track down every page of his work. With Pim & Francie: The Golden Bear Days, Fantagraphics has brought out 240 pages of the creepiest, most unsettling comics since . . . the last time Al Columbia published something.
Columbia’s characters Pim and Francie (first seen in his two-issue comic series The Biologic Show, published in the mid-’90s) are two lively, Disney-esque siblings who find themselves caught up in the most bleak, violent, and horrific adventures, amidst backdrops ranging from highly detailed realist interiors to extremely cartoonish landscapes of smiling trees.

Every page of Pim & Francie is dark and disturbing: anxiety-inducing. The two survive a haunted forest, popping their own eyes out, drowning, numerous encounters with murderous, evil creatures, as well as, on a page that bears the notation “Funny Incest Stories #06,” Francie giving birth to a freakish, slimy monster that extends out from under her little dress, still attached by the umbilical cord, while Pim points a gun at her and accuses her of cheating on him, since the baby doesn’t look like him (the baby doesn’t even appear to be from the same planet). But this description falsely gives the impression that this is some sort of “shock” work—far from it. The most disturbing material in the book (which is 90% of it) are images such as a shadowy creature at the end of a hallway, an old-timey radio exhorting Pim not to fall asleep, Francie covered in bugs, the two kids running from hooded black pursuers, and a skeleton woman doing dishes.
Pim & Francie has almost no actual narrative (or a narrative in any sort of conventional sense, at least), since most pages seem to be half-finished and partially discarded—perhaps just taken from Columbia’s sketchbook—but read together there’s a certain sequentiality to the creepiness and terror, occasionally interrupted by an actual three- or four-page story where one or both of them inevitably get killed or maimed in some horrible fashion. Columbia’s art seems strongly influenced by Disney, making everything that much more unsettling. Most of the work here is like warm-ups for a book we don’t actually get: two or three unfinished attempts at a scene until you find a mostly-finished page of Pim standing in front of a bloody cat’s head, surrounded by flies, saying “Another one! I wonder who could be leaving these dead cat heads all over the place!” a mystery of which we never see the beginning or end, but a hundred pages later we come upon a page disembodied from anything around it that features a drawing of a bed with several tiny black kittens on it and around it—and then you remember the “dead cat heads” from earlier.
Adding to the confusion are sequences that seem like they’re from something longer but are taken out of that context and stuck in the middle of the book. For instance, Pim and Francie, having dismembered some sort of animal (i.e., taken off his arms, legs, and penis), tease him that they’ll let him go on one condition, but we never see any event preceding this two-page sequence, nor anything after it. Additionally, these pages are zoomed in on so that some of the art and word balloons are cut off at the margins, denying us even more understanding. The entire book is fractured in this way, so that pages that seem from a sketchbook are next to pages that appear to have been ripped up and thrown away, only to be taken out of the trash and taped back together, though never finished. Many pages appear to be stained with coffee or tea.

The semi-finished nature of the book is another confounding aspect—one gets the feeling that if we were to wait for Columbia to finish 240 pages of work we’d never see it. However, it’s clear that the look of the book is as Columbia wanted it (meaning Columbia had no intention of doing an actual, finished, “narrative” book) and that its look makes the book seem almost like some dusty old book of memories lost in an attic (horrible memories, but still). I would argue that Pim & Francie: Golden Bear Days is the book of the year in the comics world, the fractured and unfinished and sketchbooky aspects make it so effective in its relentless, grim, churning sense of uneasiness. This is an exceptional work.
Scott Bryan Wilson is a contributing editor to The Quarterly Conversation.
Read more articles by Scott Bryan Wilson
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.