Graymont College’s Prof. Stephen Chesterfield, the less-is-more creative writing teacher who appears early on in Joshua Henkin’s second novel Matrimony, hates sound effects in stories (“kerplunk,” “kaboom”), the phrase “show, don’t tell” in workshop criticism, and “pass-the-salt dialogue”: “If your characters need salt, just give it to them. Don’t make them have a discussion about it.”
But then Julian Wainwright, the wealthy New York freshman who serves as protagonist of the novel, suggests that saying “Pass the salt” after someone has just told you that his father just died shows you’re not listening, and Prof. Chesterfield beams.
Immediately, Julian’s classmate Carter Heinz, a Californian with a chip on his shoulder, adds that he’d have a character ask a quadriplegic to pass the salt, and Prof. Chesterfield calls him brilliant.
About 130 pages into Matrimony, Henkin places struggling novelist Julian, now teaching comp at Michigan while his wife gets her doctorate in psychology, at a Berkeley restaurant with Carter, now a dot-com millionaire about to graduate from law school. After he’s seated, Julian says, “So this is the famous Chez Panisse. Do you eat here often?”
And then, later in the novel, Carter says, “I’ve got my own chair here,” a few minutes before a walk-on by a real-life celebrity prompts him to ask, “Do you realize who that was? . . . Alice Waters? Chef and owner of Chez Panisse? Spawner of a culinary revolution?”
It ain’t pass-the-salt dialogue but it’s embarrassingly clumsy. Happily, it’s a rare misfire in an otherwise believable and compelling story that manages to overcome the handicap of having a creative writing student and novelist at its center.
Matrimony chronicles the college romance and marriage of Julian, sensitive son of wealthy Sutton Place parents, and Mia, dutiful daughter of a Jewish physicist and a mother whose losing battle with breast cancer provides the novel’s most resonant passages. Descriptions of the ups and downs of Julian and Mia’s courtship and marriage are both quirky and dreamy; domestic scenes like dinners at ethnic restaurants, hanging out with friends in university towns, and an idyllic trip to Boston continue to provide quotidian but pleasant moments throughout the novel.
Henkin has a great eye for the everyday; his prose comes most alive when he’s chronicling ordinary moments in these scenes from a marriage and the streets of Manhattan, Ann Arbor, Berkeley, Iowa City, and the fictional Northington, Massachusetts.
All the characters are nice people living quiet lives of aspiration, so the novel’s major conflict, leading to the separation of Julian and Mia when she’s going for her doctorate in psychology in Ann Arbor, feels forced. The way he’s been presented up to then, Julian would be far too decent, understanding and level-headed to leave Mia after finding out about her long-ago one-time sexual encounter with his best friend Carter when all were still single. Julian’s disappearance from the novel for pages and pages seems like one of those episodes in a soap opera when a character is temporarily written out due to the actor’s illness or movie role, the reason for his absence a contrived plot device.
Finally the temporarily single Julian turns up at the Iowa Writer’s Workshop, where he and his understated fiction don’t seem to fit in:
The story was quiet; all his work was. Perhaps it was a matter of differing aesthetics. There had emerged in American fiction a strain of excess, he believed, a group of knowing authors whose every sentence seemed to shout, “Look how smart I am.” He had nothing against muscular prose; it was the flexing of those muscles that he objected to, and, along with it, a disregard for character, which, for him, was what fiction was about.
Julian drops out of Iowa; he reconciles with Mia and their marriage thrives as they move to New York; at their fifteenth college reunion, he even reconciles with Carter. Julian finally finishes and sells his novel after years of daily struggle (there’s surprisingly little space given to this); Carter finally finishes his novel too, and Julian is sure it’s good; Prof. Stephen Chesterfield, alas, has worse luck. Their creative writing teacher’s forty-year project turns out to be “uninspiring” and even “terrible” despite the “more than adequate writing.”
“Sometimes a writer’s personality gets in the way,” Julian tells Carter.
Joshua Henkin’s personality doesn’t get in the way of Matrimony, which can be seen as a radical experiment in chronicling the activities of a likeable couple and their friends and family, homage to classic comedies of manners, or a terrific beach book for MFAs. Despite the lack of real drama, I enjoyed it a great deal. Henkin’s quiet moments add up to a satisfying read and quiet refuge from the fireworks of more combustible novels. If you’re like Julian, the kind of reader for whom character is what fiction is about, you’ll enjoy Matrimony too.
Richard Grayson is the author of Highly Irregular Stories, With Hitler in New York, The Silicon Valley Diet, and other books. A retired teacher and lawyer, he divides his time between Brooklyn and Phoenix.
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.