Though the market for fiction that makes political commentary has seen better days, the nonfiction best-seller lists are packed with passionate missives from liberals and conservatives alike. Even though the latter generally preaches to the choir and fiction may do better at breaching the ideological divide, people seem to want their politics and their fiction in separate servings. Heaven help the novelist who thinks she can get in the ring with Michael Moore and Ann Coulter. You might as well book Ralph Nader on “Dancing with the Stars.”
Marc Estrin has either not taken notice of this trend, or simply doesn’t care. Perhaps he just enjoys the challenge of trying to make the social novel work. In his second novel, The Education of Arnold Hitler, Estrin certainly goes for the political gusto: A boy named Arnold Hitler (yes, the name and its implications for the hapless boy are explored) stands, literally, between JFK and the second gunman; he chats with Noam Chomsky; he befriends Leonard Bernstein—Marc Estrin, Liberal Novelist.
While that premise might induce eye-rolling, Estrin’s first novel Insect Dreams: the Half Life of Gregor Samsa (recently re-released by Unbridled Books), starts from a much more promising seed: Gregor Samsa did not die near the end of Kafka’s The Metamorphosis but instead lives, as a beetle, with a side-show of human oddities. He passes his days reading extensively and then giving lectures on Spengler and Einstein.
From that start, a series of adventures leads Samsa into America and the midst of FDR’s administration, where he becomes an “Entomological Consultant,” lives in the White House kitchen, and gets motherly attention from Eleanor.
An interesting idea, but does the book succeed as a whole? As a device for exploring the politics of the time, Estrin’s premise works well. The world seen through the eyes of a giant talking roach is very different than the one revealed through the eyes of a person. Other reviews, rightly or wrongly, have drawn comparisons to Forrest Gump, claiming that Estrin sets a surreal tone from the start by placing Samsa front and center and thereby allows us to relax our disbelief when he goes from inventing risk management to hobnobbing with FDR to Los Alamos. Whether or not this is why we can suspend our disbelief, suspend it we do.
Wisely, Estrin does not try to emulate Kafka’s prose; he captures Samsa’s personality from Kafka’s story and thankfully leaves it at that. One could complain about Samsa’s largely unchanged liberalism throughout: why not more exploration of his inner conflicts, his “metamorphosis” of ideas? This would be a minor gripe, however, as Estrin has enough tact and inventiveness to make his politics easy to imbibe by writing them into a lively story that doesn’t sacrifice entertainment in order to point out America’s mistakes. By the end, you are willing to believe this is “what would have happened if,” which is the primary duty of a novel borrowing a classic fictional character.
Andrew Seal argues that “Chicago and New York are to U.S. fiction what Tolstoy and Dostoevsky are to the Russians. Sorry, Boston. Sorry, L.A. Sorry, D.C. Sorry, San Fran. Sorry, the South. You have your claims, no doubt, but they are as the claims of Pushkin, Lermontov, Chekhov, or Gogol.” Discuss.
Phelan goes on to say, "There will, I’m sure, be no consensus about what constitutes badness or whether it belongs to the book, the reader, the situation of reading, all of the above, or none of the above," though he's almost wrong there. The list is pretty varied, from the morally-bankrupt to the so-bad-it's-good varieties, though generally the harshest judgments come against fussy stylists and purple prose. Cormac McCarthy gets singled out, by name and illustration, multiple times.
Wherein we learn that Imperial hasn’t gotten nearly the attention it deserves and “Vollmann was exceptionally gracious as both host and interview subject, quite generous with his whiskey and his time.”
In some of the best news ever, Margaret Atwood is going to have a cameo in a movie musical about hockey. Seriously. I am — what is the word? – giddy. Don’t believe me? Atwood discusses it on her blog. Can this news get better? Hell, yes. The movie also stars Olivia Newton-John.
New issue of the New York Review of Books is out, with Colm Tóibín on exile lit.
With jokes from Joyce Carol Oates and "wild imaginings" from 92-year-old winner Diana Athill -- not to mention talk of a sequel from "Wolf Hall" author Hilary Mantel -- this year's NBCC Awards were noteworthy for their celebration of literature by women.
DFW's latest cover makeover, plus a great-looking cover and a really not-so-great-looking cover.
Since buying The Selected Poems of Wallace Stevens at City Lights, I’ve been rereading many Stevens poems and trying to understand it from a more mature perspective. Last time I read a vast amount of Stevens was when I was 22 for a class on Stevens, T.S. Eliot, Yeats, and Marianne Moore. With fifteen years [...]
The 2010 Best Translated Book Awards were announced last night at Idlewild Books, Manhattan. The Confessions of Noa Weber by Gail Hareven, translated by Dalya Bilu won the fiction award, and the poetry award went to Elena Fanailova for The Russian Version, translated from the Russian by Genya Turovskaya and Stephanie Sandler. Check out the [...]
The National Book Critics Circle Award is announcing their winners tonight. The diversity of their nominations, from the better known (such as Hilary Mantel and Mary Karr) to the less mainstream (such as Rachel Zucker and Eula Biss), makes the blog entries on the nominees an interesting read. I added Stephen Burt’s Close Calls with [...]
Lipsyte: Well these were the famous classes that he taught and others have written about it. He would kind of perform an amazing monologue for hours that would be a work of art in and of itself, in the way it was constructed in real time and kept pulling threads through and weaving all these elements together, but the content of it would be reflections on writing and art and what it is to be an artist and how one should approach the page. And then at the end of that—and that could go for four or five hours—at the end of that, he would call on students to read from whatever it was they were working on, but normally you wouldn't get too far, because he would stop you probably within a sentence or two and point out all that was false in what you had perpetrated.
In the brief essay that J.C. Hallman will deliver at a panel discussion at the 2010 AWP Conference in Denver, Hallman will offer up his own insights as to the nature of this admittedly flawed practice. The essay will be, to some extent, experimental. It will have a self-referential quality, it will aspire to innovation, indeed it will even be accurate to describe it as "meta-," but of course Hallman will use none of these terms, though he would like to. Book proposals are not places for words like innovation and experimentation. Instead, Hallman's essay will be "quirky and fun."
Seven Nights Jorge Luis Borges (trans. Eliot Weinberger). New Directions. $12.95, 128pp. In Seven Nights, the recently re-released collection of lectures-turned-essays originally given in Buenos Aires in 1977, Borges does not discuss the phenomenon of déjà vu. He does, however, speak at great length about nightmares and dreams, which he describes as “a kind of modest [...]
Best European Fiction 2010 edited by Aleksandar Hemon, preface by Zadie Smith. Dalkey Archive Press.448 pp, $15.95. “The great pest of speech is frequency of translation,” Samuel Johnson once wrote, in the preface to his iconic Dictionary of the English Language: No book was ever turned from one language into another without imparting something of its native [...]
“There are, of course, newspapers to keep responsible Americans up to date when trouble looms, and public television or even the History Channel to inform us about the occasional historic battle or archaeological discovery or civil war. What else do we need?” Claudia Roth Pierpont frames her essay on the contemporary Arabic novel, published in [...]