Imperial. William T. Vollmann. Viking. 1334pp, $55.00.
In the first chapter of Imperial we find William T. Vollmann on the filthy, shit- and trash-filled New River (a “reeking brown cloaca”), sweating in a 110+ degree temperature, rowed in a cheap rubber raft by a Mexican who has never been in a boat in his life. Water splashes on them and now Vollmann has a sore that won’t heal. It’s here that he begins his investigation into the “imaginary entity called Imperial”—an area encompassing Imperial County, CA, plus an equal area south of the Mexican border. It’s a wide-ranging exploration that includes illegal aliens, pollution, water quality, the infighting and bureaucracy in America over water rights and irrigation, the idea of boundaries, poverty, the systematic oppression of the poor, agriculture, the desert, the relationship between America and Mexico, farm laborers’ attempts at unionizing, and the allegedly brutal conditions in the maquiladoras, among dozens of other things.
Imperial is an enormous book, and Vollmann attempts to fit in everything he possibly can about this area with which he is seemingly obsessed, and in which he sees so many possibilities yet so much inequity: “Let’s therefore call Imperial County the center of the world, for so it is to anyone who pauses to stand within it, making it here,” he writes.1
Regarding Mexico, Vollmann admits that it is “a nation of which after all these years and pages I remain largely ignorant . . .” though this sort of defeatist admission is nothing new for Vollmann, who also writes: “If only I knew how to tell you how beautiful it is!” Such candor is part of what lets Imperial succeed as we follow Vollmann’s accounts of his adventures and watch him constantly become stymied. At one point he purchases a secret camera that fits in a button so that he can infiltrate a maquiladora and reveal the conditions inside; he’s rebuffed at every turn, and like many of the sequences in the book, he spends so much time in the pursuit of his goal that even in the end when he finally fails to achieve what he was after, the chase is exhilarating. (In this case, the chase includes watching him spend peso after peso on surveillance equipment that doesn’t work correctly, and then later sitting through an hour of footage of treetops and the sky since the tiny hidden camera doesn’t allow him to fast-forward).
It’s not as though Vollmann isn’t aware of his inadequacies. As he puts it: “In Mexico I have been lied to about subterranean Chinese tunnels; I have been very occasionally cheated and misdirected over the years; but never in Imperial have I felt so walled off by silence as I did when researching the maquiladoras.” Or: as a private investigator tells him: “Let’s face it, Bill. Investigative reporting is not really your strong suit.” But here he is, pouring thousands of dollars and years of his life into the pursuit of understanding this place where illegals try and try and try again to cross into America, where Mexicans will often proclaim that despite their poverty they are more free than Americans, where pollution is off the charts and where factory conditions are unspeakably awful. Vollmann is dedicated to Imperial because he wants to explain how, because they are divided by a line—the border—life can be so different for people who live hundreds of feet apart.
This point is driven home in one of Imperial’s most brilliant sections, where Vollmann juxtaposes of the lives of two poor Mexicans—one just over the line in the U.S., the other just over the line in Mexico. The one in Mexico is a homeless beggar and the one in the U.S. is a laborer/vegetable harvester. Jose (the beggar) points out that Lupe (the laborer) is luckier because he lives in America, but by now we know that Lupe is completely miserable, and Jose isn’t doing much better. There’s such a sadness to both their tales, their routines, their poverty, yet they both get up every day and do what they have to do to stay alive.
Imperial contains all the adventure that was missing from Riding Toward Everywhere as Vollmann enlists the help of everyone from Mormon genealogists to an army of private detectives to chemists to his hired translators and guides. This group includes Jose Lopez, whom Vollmann sends into all the Chinese restaurants in Mexicali to ask about the fabled Chinese tunnels—but Lopez is completely unsuccessful, probably due to the fact that he reeked of diarrhea, from which he’d been suffering all day. It’s rumored that the Chinese are “harboring a vampire down there” in the tunnels, and Vollmann is determined to know the truth. (His friend Lupe Vasquez’s recommendation on how to find info on the tunnels: pay a cop to “put his pistol against the head of the nearest old gook.”) Furthermore, Vollmann rides along with the border patrol, who arrest thousands of would-be illegal immigrants every night; later, in a gripping scene Vollmann recounts his own experiences being detained by immigration when crossing the border, his anger and rage at both his treatment and, especially, the treatment of his girlfriend.
Readers who have never cared for Vollmann’s style won’t be converted by Imperial, but it does in fact contain some of his most wonderful writing, as well as some of his trademark similes: “I see a glaring white road through volunteer alfalfa as short as the stubble on a pubis that was shaved two weeks ago”; “You’ll be relieved to know that on the other side of the ditch, everything remains as clean as a fifteen-year-old prostitute”; “This book, like the Virgin of Guadalupe herself, is syncretic; Liliana, like Mexicali, was still more so, for she possessed the supernatural power of spewing diarrhea at the very moment of singing me a beautiful song.”
Vollmann’s writing takes on a somewhat epic quality when he recounts historical events, and in these sections his text is also permeated by sarcasm—a sarcasm that is so persistent and so dry that it almost stops seeming like sarcasm and begins to take on a very innocent, sincere quality. When Vollmann discusses Prohibition he seems to almost feel for the women who crusaded against alcohol, though we know from his body of work that there is no way he would sympathize with their opinions: “I suppose that our heroines of temperance are able to soldier on in good heart just the same, until that ghastly year 1926, when even Volstead gets quoted as saying that three point seven five percent beer is innocuous. Lift up mine eyes, O Lord! And in 1933, Prohibition is undone. Poor ladies!” Something I find so valuable in Vollman’s writing—all of his writing—something which I return to from time to time in my life, is his insistence on not judging anyone, on trying to understand everyone he comes across, no matter how arrogant, filthy, wrong, or poor, and that attitude is seen here regarding these long-dead “heroines of temperance,” as well as on every single page of Imperial. Vollmann’s sympathy is deep and sincere, even when the people are strangers who sometimes use him for money or attempt to otherwise take advantage of him. 2
In a book this long and this ambitious there are bound to be some slow spots, and Imperial has a few. Some of the agricultural material is almost unbearably dull, paragraph after bewildering paragraph of statistics and charts regarding production of seemingly every crop grown on the Mexico/California border: “Imperial County grows more than seventy-three thousand cotton acres that year [with a footnote: 'Riverside grows 20,087 acres; Los Angeles's acreage is zero']; the yield is over two and a half bales per acre. Mexican Imperial contains a disproportionate number of cornscapes, but in 2000 we find seventy-one thousand, three hundred and twenty acres of cotton in the northeast corner of the Mexicali valley alone.” Such reams of statistics are all the more jarring because, for all the deserving attention Vollmann pays to immigration, poverty, agriculture, Chinese tunnels, and obscure, long-dead figures who sometimes only appear as a first or last name in a letter, some material is given almost no attention: there’s a brief attempt, in the book’s shortest chapter (twelve pages), to discuss the Indians native to the area, and there’s just one mention of the murders of maquiladora women in Ciudad Juarez, a subject that seems almost inconceivably perfect for investigation by Vollmann.
Despite occasional lapses, there’s so much great material in the book that even a list can only mention of some of the outstanding pieces: Vollmann’s histories of Imperial in the styles of Flaubert, Steinbeck, and Hammett; his attempted biography of a pioneer named Wilber Clark; his attempts to understand both the literal and figurative boundaries of Imperial, comparing them to Rothko’s paintings; and the slow accumulation of phrases from historical documents and present-day interviews that snowball throughout the text, specific to the time period which they’re being used to describe, with the closing chapters of each section consisting of reprises of nothing but little paragraphs of these phrases, slowly adding up to a history of the Imperial Valley area while still being a commentary on contemporary life, not just in Imperial, but America and Mexico . . .
Many people think Vollmann writes or publishes too much, that he’s sloppy and doesn’t take enough time with his material, that his fascination with poverty and prostitutes and drugs is tasteless. Though I disagree with all of these claims, I’ll still, acknowledge that if the page count of Imperial doesn’t scare away many potential readers, the $55 cover price will. That would be too bad, because Imperial is a book that sustained my interest over the course of two months and that, I feel, is an intense and cohesive summation of Vollmann’s career so far. In it can be seen bits of Poor People, of Riding Toward Everywhere, even bits of the Seven Dreams series, and in a way it contains every thematic element of his prior works, which may in fact be why the “imaginary entity called Imperial” fascinated him so much in the first place. It’s a staggering work.
1On a trip to Paris, the flight attendant came over to me, motioned to Imperial, and helpfully pointed out that the flight was only seven hours. At 1125 pages (of small print), plus another 181 pages of sources, chronology, and bibliography,a it’s easily Vollmann’s longest work (in a career built on prolifically publishing very lengthy works), excepting the unabridged Rising Up and Rising Down, which is about 2000 pages longer.
aAnd don’t forget the accompanying book of Vollmann’s photographs, also entitled Imperial, also just published.
2One example among many: a woman comes over to his hotel to sing him some narcocorridos (“prohibited ballads”—radio-banned songs about federale-killing drug lords): “Stinking like a toilet, she used my toilet without flushing it, spraying urine and toilet paper all over the floor. Then she sat back down on the bed, rubbing her reddish-brown skin and apologizing for not having written out the lyrics; she’d been too busy at work. She had five children. Although she was only in her forties she looked as if she were nearing sixty.”
Scott Bryan Wilson is a contributing editor to The Quarterly Conversation.
Read more articles by Scott Bryan Wilson
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.