John Updike is my neighbor. He lives just across the park, in the half-block of brick condos, each urbanely fused to its neighbor, each yard a tight rectangle of sod. John Updike has a little white dog, one of those lap dogs. I think it’s a Westie.
He sits out on a bench in his front yard—the bench occupies practically the whole yard—and surveys us across the street, in the park, where we, the young, let our dogs mingle. The park is this half-bowl that leans into a hill, and from us with our dogs there is a straight sight line to where he sits on the bench. I have not talked to John Updike. He seems rather vaguely pissed off at me, or at people like me, with our mutty labs and Weimaraners and Great Danes and Irish Wolfhounds that terrorize the park, the dusty bowl a veritable dog-rodeo at the end of each workday. We are the same people who pace the sidewalks of this neighborhood, letting our dogs shit on all that closely guarded grass. When I walk by his condo, I can feel him glare and then turn away, as if I’m not even worth a sneer. This neighborhood’s still on the upswing of gentrification. Apartments are morphing into condos everyday, the rents doubling, the copper gutters going up up up. In a year we’ll be out, off to cheaper pastures, off to Crestwood, where hipsters go to die. I have no idea how long John Updike has lived here, in my town.
Philip Roth works out at my gym. Sometimes I have to wait for him to get off the leg press. Our workouts tend to overlap—Saturday mornings, Thursday afternoons, whenever. I have not spoken to Philip Roth. How could I? A hateful glare would be a kindness. I wonder if he knows about John Updike. I’m pretty sure Philip Roth doesn’t do dogs.
In a way, it’s funny that Philip Roth should work out at my gym, which—without giving you way more demographic data than you want—is basically about as goy as you can possibly get, the WASP epicenter of what is an overwhelmingly WASP town. (Could this place be any more goyish? I ask myself when I see him.) But Philip Roth is, notably, not working out at the Jewish community center across town, which is much nicer than my gym. And it feels appropriate for him to be here, sweating among the fallen yuppies, the college kids on the lam from school, the young unworking mothers intently toning, the junior attorneys who speed here from the office and change into their frayed fraternity T-shirts. It feels appropriate that he should not talk to anyone, that he should not engage in our chatter, which is one part foreplay, two parts 8th-grade P.E. It feels appropriate that he should never serve as or request a spotter. It feels appropriate that he should be as monastic and forthright with his workout as he is with his writing. But probably most of all, it feels appropriate that Philip Roth should bench considerably more than me.
Saul Bellow works at my school. I see him mostly in the mornings, and sometimes on TV. They put him on for scholastic color commentary—he’s a dean, naturally—and he’s always rakishly charming, old but still dangerous, withered but still virile. In the mornings he strides in late. I see him across the quad, walking fast but without the heat of stress. His collar is loose. His cuffs are unbuttoned; they gape groggily from his coat sleeve holes. His tie lies like a ribbon around his neck, waiting for the Four In Hand. People don’t call him by his name. He is simply The Dean. He doesn’t speak to anyone as he walks, only smiles and nods, and everyone loves him. The administrative assistants act like a harem.
John Updike’s face has not changed so much. Through the years, as the hair has grayed and the ears have slightly elongated, his face has remained a beacon of confidence and happiness. His face is that of the favorite son. All of his charisma and accomplishment seem caught up in his nose and in his eyebrows. They each hold his secrets: the brows are furious with hair, each filament clamoring for attention, a symbol of his primordial industriousness; the nose, on the other hand, is a refined fin. He has gotten more sharkish in his old age and acquired the sharpened nose of a professional’s professional.

© Archive Photos
Roth’s face has thinned with age. It’s no longer the full flesh of a 1962 Naomi Savage postcard I have, where his hair and his shirt bleed into the black background so that only his face is visible, young and glowing and horribly talented. In the photo, his face has the close-lipped certainty of a man on a mission. Now, his face is more wolfish, his whole body rangier, the Adam’s Apple just another protruding joint, a knuckle in the neck. He never smiles in his photos, just stares down the camera with a pitiful look, that is, full of pity for the camera, the spectator, those needy voyeurs out there in the audience. It’s a face that withers.

© Naomi Savage
Bellow is always all smiles. As I type this, on my aging Compaq, a picture of Bellow smiling above his Royal benevolently keeps watch. Bellow is the happy father. I have another picture somewhere in my files—like the FBI, yes, I’ve got files—of Bellow on the subway, dapper in an overcoat and suit and hat, among the mortals, a man about town, a man of the town. This town has made this man. Surely, the graphic artists had Bellow in mind when they began to create those large poster portraits that are in fact mosaics of smaller portraits. In Bellow, the faces of a city—that liar, this schemer, that saint.
And Bellow is there on the back flap of the Collected Stories, the one with the snow-covered car on the front. He’s unbelievably old, with proud yellow teeth, his face like something left out in the rain. He’s in a black hat and leather jacket, his collar kicked up, laughing. No distended gut and suspenders for him. No sportscoat saved from 1976. At the time of the photo Bellow had just had his fourth child, born by his fifth wife. It must feel good to feel so good.

Once, as a counselor at camp, I was repeatedly mistaken for Chandler Bing, the character played by Matthew Perry on Friends. More than one camper tugged my arm to say how much I looked like Chandler, so much so that they simply forgot my name.
I don’t think I look anything like him, I’d say.
You don’t? You’re totally Chandler. It’s your face, your voice, the way you make jokes.
But that’s not him, I’d say. That’s me. I’m just being me.
Come on, they’d say. Could you be any more like Chandler?
Campers, once convinced, tend to be hard to unconvince.
I think about John Updike a good bit, but especially when walking my dog. I think about telling John Updike about John Updike. I imagine crossing the threshold of the small lawn and saying, John, you look so much like John.
I can in my saner moments admit that this is not John Updike.
But it doesn’t take away the urge to confront him, to bring him books, pictures, to teach him about himself. I want to bring the Everyman’s Library edition of Rabbit Angstrom and say, Feel this. This is your body given up to you. Read this in remembrance of yourself. But what if he still doesn’t understand?
Would Philip—in my head, yes, I call him Philip—understand the importance of Nathan Zuckerman, his double’s double? Roth’s mind’s own man? Would he look at the latest press photo and say, I’m much younger than that old man, and amble off to the showers?
Bellow, I’m sure, wouldn’t cotton to my presence. I couldn’t even get a meeting with Bellow—I’m sorry. The Dean is too busy to see you right now.
They wouldn’t want to hear from me no matter what I said. No one wants to hear that they’re a carbon copy of someone else. I didn’t.
Once, taking guitar lessons, I kept playing little riffs and songlets I’d come up with, and my teacher would listen to a few bars, and say, Oh yeah, you know what that is, don’t you? That’s—and then he’d go on to play the rest of my song, i.e., someone else’s. This was infuriating. Look, I wanted to tell him, this is not someone else’s song. Don’t confuse the ineluctable modality of the individual. This is completely mine; this half song is my creation, no one else’s. Don’t confuse my originality with someone else’s.
And to be sure, if I drove you around town to prove my little Updike/Roth/Bellow thesis, you’d point out how they don’t look exactly like their doppelgangers, how they don’t even look enough alike. Perhaps I’m like Hermann in Nabokov’s Despair, manufacturing a twin. Besides, no carbon copy is perfect. There are always smudges. There are always some impressions that don’t come through, some accidental creasings and pin points that do. There is always that sinful inky odor, as if the carbons know that they and you are committing something unholy.
But maybe there really are multiple Philip Roths out there. Perhaps, rather than postmodern narrative trickery, rather than endless variations on a biographical theme, the Philip Roth that we know is just one of many. Perhaps the Philip Roth we know is simply the best Philip, the most talented Philip, the Philip that partakes of the most genius. Perhaps these three, the “real” three, are simply better at being themselves than all the other John Updikes or Philip Roths or Saul Bellows out there, who ended up selling life insurance or fitting braces or whatever.
And what if Chandler Bing is simply a poor, pre-heated version of me, and I am the real me, the best me, the only me that can fulfill all the me-potential in the world? What if Chandler Bing was an opening act for my me-ness?
Oh, I like this idea. Call that camper. Get the guitar teacher on the phone. You haven’t heard the last of me, I’ll tell them. You’ve only heard the premonition of me. I’ve seen the real triumvirate and I’ve seen their shadows—I’ve lived with their shadows!—and I’m moving out, I’m moving up, I’m moving into the light, I’m getting a new neighborhood. Oh, you’re going to be seeing so much more of me.
Read more articles by Barrett Hathcock
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.