Fugue State Brian Evenson
(with art by Zak Sally). Coffee House Press. 208 pp, $14.95
In the eponymous story of Brian Evenson’s collection Fugue State, the protagonist can’t figure out if he’s the subject or viewer, if he’s being analyzed or is analyzing. He doesn’t know where he is, what he’s doing, or who he is.
Your name is Roeg, the voice said. You are a small man. This is your home. I’m very sorry for all that’s happened to you. My name is—
And then it stopped. Roeg, he thought. Is that my name?
What is my name? he wondered.
My name? he wondered. Why do I want to know?
The narrator has to be told who he is. A voice, anonymous, describes the narrator to himself. This voice in a way gives the narrator a life, perhaps different than the one he had before. But it all is shattered when the narrator in that last line asks, “My name . . . Why do I want to know?” Is that what existence is all about, this narrator seems to ask—identity and recognition of that identity?
In Dan Chaon’s recent novel Await Your Reply—a work that attempts to mask a person’s identity and recreate another as he sees fit—a Fugue State is defined as
A dissociative psychological state marked by sudden, unexpected travel away from home or one’s customary place of work, with inability to recall one’s past, confusion about personal identity, or the assumption of a new identity, or significant distress or impairment.
Like Chaon’s novel, Evenson’s story collection has characters who try to dissociate themselves from their beginnings (or who have their beginnings redefined by others), who consciously neglect previous happenings and logical prognostications to believe what they want to believe to make the best of their situation at hand. They look at their past as a constellation, trying to fit the events in order so that it makes the now more palatable. It’s an unrealistic notion, but it’s one that is aptly accentuated by the gothic and grotesque nature of these stories.
“Ninety Over Ninety,” one of the longer and fuller stories of this collection, takes a traditional theme—a man in want of his freedom, a man wanting to do what he feels he needs to do—and adds a somewhat psychotic and dark-humorous angle. Philip Kossweiller, an editor at a small publishing house, wants to find that next great work that will define him as the editor with a great eye for literature. But unfortunately he hasn’t broken out any lucrative blockbusters for his publisher. A familiar stance is taken by the company: “No more of this literature crap. Sure, it’s good, but literature’s the icing on the cake. You don’t spread icing all over an empty plate, do you?”
Kossweiller is given three chances to find this blockbuster, botching the first and second with memorable humor. In his last swing, with the help of the marketing/publicity manager, he creates an over-the-top thriller starring a Swedish detective. And it works, becoming a franchise, employing titles that are as kitschy as James Patterson’s or Sue Grafton’s, but with punning variations of the Swedish detective’s name: First Bjorn Child, Bjorn Again, Bjorn Free. They get worse with time, less readable in Kossweiller’s eyes but more successful in the public’s. “I hate my life . . . I have no soul” is all Kossweiller can say about himself; for in the back of his mind all he wants is to edit a new literary project, a carrot at the end of the stick his publisher is waving in front of his face. He recognizes that he has lost his own concept of self.
Finally growing a backbone, he goes to his publisher and announces his exit, but his publisher gives him a clever ultimatum: before he can leave he must edit a collection of ninety stories by nonagenarians. The threat is that the publisher is going to create an editorial persona of Kossweiller, placing Kossweiller’s name in big font on the jacket cover of this odious book so that no other house would want him editing literary fiction. Evenson here brilliantly turns the tables over and over again in this story, showcasing the fight for identity to be one that will be tempestuous, the hardest thing one may have to do in life.
In the book’s more evocative and existential story “Dread” (which features the artwork of Zak Sally), Evenson reveals to us the logical conclusion of bending facts: his protagonist begins fearing the line “He no longer resembles me,” which soon eats away at his mind. Through minimalist drawings—though text-heavy sketches—we watch a literary brain and body crumble, until the chilling moment when we realize the true effects of what “He no longer resembles me” means: When the narrator stares at himself in the mirror he realizes “There was no getting around him. And here we still are, staring each other down, haggard and grim, bodies aching, each of us hoping the other will be the first to go.” This is nothing extraordinary but it gives us a moment to contemplate the gravity of not identifying our person, how that is possible and what it would do to our mind.
Evenson certainly has a way with setting up stories so that they are chilling or threatening when need be. Even at their least interesting, the stories in this collection entertain with their proximity to nightmares, following in the footsteps of Edgar Allan Poe. Yet Fugue State is probably too big for its own good: nineteen stories that riff on similar themes makes this collection too cumbersome to keep in one’s mind, disallowing what is being said and done to linger as it should. Having so many bits and pieces makes the reader feel as if the author threw in everything in his arsenal and thus the burden is on the reader to pick up the pieces and select which are good and which are bad. For when you take a step back and look, the unevenness of these stories is revealed: some stand out with their vicious images or their intense characterization while other, less imaginative ones are swept away in their wake. Still, that shouldn’t take away from the fact that when Evenson is on mark, he nails it completely. Just a little fat trimming, to keep the questions of who am I to a minimum, would have rectified this issue and made Fugue State a truly haunting book.
Salvatore Ruggiero attended Cornell and Oxford Universities. His writing has appeared in Rain Taxi, Powell’s, and the Five Borough Book Review. Currently working in publishing, he lives in Brooklyn, New York.
Read more articles by Salvatore Ruggiero
Read more articles about books from Coffee House Press
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.