Castle, J. Robert Lennon. Graywolf. 224pp, $22.00.
In his previous—and best-known—novel, Mailman (2003), J. Robert Lennon, a connoisseur of misanthropy, recounts the disintegration of a postal worker with faded dreams of glory as a physicist. Even as he makes his appointed rounds each day, fifty-seven-year-old Albert Lippincott detests his work and his clients. “He hated mail,” explains Lennon, “and he hated people—yes, because people were the ones who sent mail.” Eric Loesch is even less gregarious than that resentful mailman. At the end of Lennon’s latest—and fifth—novel, Castle, Loesch concedes that: “I was, in the end, a misfit.”
He begins the book by following a hallowed American tradition—taking to the woods. After purchasing 612 rugged acres near Gerrysburg, a small, moribund community in upstate New York, Loesch sets about making the dilapidated old house that sits on his secluded property habitable again. And he begins methodically exploring his domain, a dense, bosky expanse that, but for one mysterious white doe, seems devoid of fauna. Proud of his resourcefulness and self-reliance, he bristles at any hint of interest or sympathy from anyone in town. His sole connection to the world is a sister, Jill, whom he has not seen since their parents died, in an apparent murder-suicide twenty-five years ago. Residents of Gerrysburg who encounter Loesch during his brief forays to gather supplies are intimidated by what he calls “my trim profile, stern bearing, and unwavering gaze.” However, a reader’s curiosity is not so easily subdued, and one keeps turning pages to learn just what this man is up to. What exactly led him to put down stakes in this forsaken wilderness? Loesch presents himself as a man with a mission, but what precisely is it?
Though reticent about the past and his ambitions for the future, Loesch, who insists on fidelity only to facts, eventually reveals that he grew up in Gerrysburg, that his father loaned him out to an eccentric research psychologist named Avery Stiles for cruel experiments in behavioral modification, and that he was discharged from the Army after abusing prisoners in Iraq. Meanwhile, reconnoitering through his private forest, Loesch comes upon a rocky promontory and beside it, just beyond the legal boundary of his land, spies a hidden castle. Reveling in stealth and the guerrilla tactics he mastered in the military, he engages in a lethal struggle with its elusive, demented proprietor.
The stubborn determination with which Loesch tackles his solitary project marks him as a misbegotten heir to Walden Pond’s Henry David Thoreau, a deranged cousin to Lewis Medlock, the fanatical survivalist in James Dickey’s Deliverance. Like Allie Fox, the cranky Yankee utopian in Paul Theroux’s The Mosquito Coast, he has turned his back on slack, indulgent civilization. In contrast to his sister, whom he imagines as living “a life of promiscuity, rootlessness, and substance abuse,” Loesch maintains rigorous discipline. Despite having shed his military uniform, he soldiers on alone, scornful of the laxity that characterizes civilian society. “I am a man of some considerable courage,” he proclaims. “This is not a boast, merely a statement of fact.”
Single-minded Eric Loesch is not nearly as appealing a companion as Lennon’s antic mailman, Albert Lippincott. And, though built on madness, Castle lacks the madcap qualities of the earlier novel. It offers, instead, sustained immersion into the traumatized mind of a cunning malcontent. The illusion of total control both attracts and repels him. Loesch’s sovereignty over his own reclusive world is subverted by a series of uncanny occurrences; the novel’s eerie pacing suggests that the only monarchy is ruled by a Stephen King. Loesch acknowledges nostalgia for the freedom of a mere functionary: “There is no comfort like the comfort of following orders. There is no relief like being relieved of agency.” He also comes to accept the limits of his own powers: “Eventually I would learn that all human beings are inherently weak, and that our efforts to overcome that weakness were little more than pathetic sallies up the face of an impossibly high mountain.”
Anyone who titles a novel Castle must reckon with the ghost of Franz Kafka, and Lennon’s is a universe fraught with inscrutable, unatonable guilt. Loesch’s property is the site of an Indian massacre, his mind the continuing stage for memories of a torture fortress much like Abu Ghraib. Lennon falters a bit in constructing his narrator’s perspective; to accommodate the reader, Loesch sometimes pretends to be discovering things that he must already be aware of. But the novel’s considerable power derives from the cumulative force of familiar truths locked within the spirit’s castle keep.
Steven G. Kellman is the author of Redemption: The Life of Henry Roth (Norton), the editor of M. E. Ravage’s 1917 memoir An American in the Making (Rutgers), and a professor of comparative literature at the University of Texas at San Antonio.
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.