Zainab Salbi’s life is difficult to pin down in a sentence. Is she “a member of Saddam Hussein’s inner circle who defected to the United States”? Or is she the “founder of the charity organization for war victims ‘Women for Women International’”? Until her book, Between Two Worlds, was published this year, she kept those two spheres almost entirely separate. You might think she would have leveraged her escape from Iraq to build public awareness of her organization, but during the key formative years of the group she kept her links to Saddam a secret, claiming only to be an Iraqi tourist who was stranded in America during the first Gulf War.
Why? And why reveal that connection now, after Women for Women International has already become a successful global charity? To answer those questions, Salbi begins with her early childhood, in a wealthy Shia family in Baghdad in the 1970s. Her mother was an heiress, her father a pilot, and both were at the height of the Baghdad social scene. Saddam had courted their friendship as he rose through the ranks of Iraqi political power—with friends such as these, there could be no doubting that he, as a member of an unremarkable family from the backwater of Tikrit, was worthy of his political ambitions.
When Saddam became president in 1979, he dragged his circle of “friends” into the halls of power. Salbi’s father became the President’s personal pilot; Saddam built the family a vacation home in what was then barren desert, between Baghdad and the airport. The Salbis, like Saddam’s other friends, were expected to stay at the home he built for them every weekend, just in case he decided to pop in for a visit. Instead of dominating the social scene in Baghdad, they were dominated by Saddam as he built his own social circle in the desert.
It is in this setting that we are introduced to the first of the book’s technical difficulties. Is this a book about Saddam, or is it a childhood memoir? The book’s language is often childish and innocent—an intentional artifact to steep us in the experience of being a nine-year-old in a grown-up world? Or the clumsy efforts to patch together an ill-conceived narrative? For the book’s first 200 pages, it seems to be the latter. The strained phrasing and repetitive language, the overuse of clichés, and the colorless dialogue make the book a chore to read, relieved only by the brief, stark excerpts from Salbi’s mother’s notes to her, written years later as she was dying in her daughter’s Virginia apartment. These notes, perhaps only 20 pages in total, offer the only clear window through Salbi’s murky prose to the reality of life with Saddam.
The second issue is one I find in all co-authored memoirs: Whose voice am I reading? How can I be certain that the thoughts expressed here are Salbi’s own? Is this really the story Salbi wants to tell? The fact that the voice itself is so often expressed so ineptly only compounds the problem. Salbi tells us in an afterword that Becklund forced her to write more than she was initially comfortable with about her childhood. This discomfort is evident in the text, regardless of whether the words are Becklund’s or Salbi’s.
Finally, the book suffers from the “supporting cast member” syndrome. Clearly Saddam is the key figure in the book; after all he is the only person named in its title. Salbi herself was a mere wallflower, the daughter of Saddam’s friends. It’s a tough burden to show us why we should be reading a book about her instead of a book about Saddam himself.
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.