A book of magazine articles implies certain contradictions. Magazines are read and then, a few weeks or months later, recycled or passed on, while books linger, asserting their worthiness to be reread. The anthology Best American Magazine Writing 2007, consisting of winners and finalists from the American Society of Magazine Editors’ annual awards and published in conjunction with the Columbia School of Journalism, takes on that very contradiction. In the introduction, ASME president Cynthia Leive claims that these articles “are just as rich and rewarding on the second or third reading as they were . . . on the first.” And she’s right; except for one misstep, they succeed. From mountain climbing to Mozart, Agent Orange to Scientology, these articles almost unanimously engage.
The exception is Vanessa Grigoriadis’s profile of fashion designer Karl Lagerfield, which is also unfortunately the first piece in the book. Though it is cleverly written, it really does seem to be, well, all style.
Is this criticism fair? Does everything need to mean something? Whether serious or lighthearted, if an essay or article is going to endure it must do more than just portray something. It must ask, directly or indirectly, some questions, and the very best articles use one very specific topic as a prism to separate out larger issues. For example, William Langewiesche’s “Rules of Engagement” discusses an instance of possible war crimes committed in Iraq, but resonates beyond the current conflict by making readers consider where exactly the responsibility for a soldier’s choices lies. Conversely, Caroline Alexander’s profile of mountaineer Reinhold Messner in “Murdering the Impossible” succeeds where Grigoriadis fails, moving beyond Messner’s admittedly fascinating subject to investigate a human need to exceed limitations.
Read together as an anthology, certain themes emerge. For example, Tom Junod’s “The Loved Ones” and Andrew Corsello’s “The Other Side of Hate,” which both address guilt, innocence, and forgiveness, are strengthened by their juxtaposition. Junod’s article, an unsettling analysis of criminal charges brought against two New Orleans nursing home owners whose unevacuated patients died in Hurricane Katrina, examines the country’s need to blame someone for the Katrina tragedy. Meanwhile, Corsello’s piece looks at the friendship between a hotheaded young black priest in Zimbabwe and an older white farmer whose land has been taken, sensitively detailing their efforts to transform themselves and empathize with other victims of their country’s ongoing tragedies. In some ways it is the other half of Junod’s analysis, offering the difficult but ultimately achievable possibility of moving past blame to forgiveness.
Equally gripping is “The School,” C.J Chivers’ lengthy, nearly hour-by-hour recreation of the three-day siege of a Russian school by Chechan rebels. Though the writing is terse and less obviously crafted than the other pieces, Chivers allows the voices of dozens of hostages to come through. Sheer horror results. “Prairie Fire,” about the unexplained suicide of an adored Nebraska adolescent prodigy, is a very different read, but again, Konigsberg allows the voices and opinions of his interview subjects (the boy’s parents, psychologist, sister, friends, and ex-piano teachers, among others) to come through. By the end of the article, many of their arguments have unraveled, forcing the reader to question what exactly intelligence is and how to measure it.
While many of the best entries are reportage or features addressing deadly serious topics, Sandra Tsing Loh’s “Rhymes with Rich” shows that it doesn’t have to be that way. Her nastily hilarious column skewers wealthy, self-obsessed mothers and could serve as a case-study of our so-called postfeminist era. Other standouts include Susan Casey’s environmental wake-up call, “Our Oceans are Turning into Plastic . . . Are We?,” Michael Donohue’s essay “Russell and Mary,” about the writer’s attempts to recreate a life from the papers he found in the home of his deceased landlady, and Janet Reitman’s “Inside Scientology” with its wrenching interviews from young people trying to escape from the cult.
According to the Magazine Publishers of America’s statistics, the average magazine reader spends only 44 minutes per issue, whereas books take days or weeks. Magazines can be read out of order, books usually are not. You can skip a lot of articles in a magazine and still feel that you “got through” the whole thing; a book isn’t over till it’s over. So how then, should we read the Best American Magazine Articles? Out of order, I’d say, skipping at least one article, but keeping it to read again.
Elizabeth Wadell is a contributing editor to The Quarterly Conversation.
Read more articles by Elizabeth Wadell
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.