3:31 pm Sit down on my brown couch that looks out over the Hollywood sign and begin to read Haruki Murakami’s latest novel, After Dark, which clocks in at a slim 208 pages.
3:32 Drink water.
3:34 Realize the book is told in the present tense in a single night, with each chapter bearing a clock showing the hour, and decide to write a review that mirrors this real-time technique.
3:40 Admire Murakami for attempting to write a plural first-person narrator that seems to be a sentient camera: “We are sheer point of view . . . our viewpoint takes the form of a midair camera that can move freely about the room.”
3:41 Dislike Murakami for attempting to write a plural first-person narrator that seems to be a sentient camera.
3:43 Laugh because the first chapter includes doppelgangers, tiny bikinis, jazz music, a story within a story, American icons (Denny’s), and unrevealed and mysterious names—all familiar Murakami leitmotifs. Despite the familiarity, he manages to make each book seem new by the way he tweaks the motifs.
3:50 Realize that in After Dark Murakami achieves his double-world theme, which is drawn most sharply in Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World and is present throughout much of his oeuvre, by repeatedly emphasizing the otherworldly quality of the neighborhood at night, as opposed to the day. Hence the title, After Dark, which is also a reference to the jazz song “Five Spot After Dark.”
3:53 Find that Murakami’s divided physical world is also reflected in the divided psychological world of his characters. Splitting character psyches is hardly a new technique, except that in After Dark every single character seems to have a doppelganger—a “night” side to balance the “day” side—whether in a sibling or a stranger. It’s almost too neat. But more importantly, these split personas function as much more than excavations of internal struggles—the journey to identify these doppelgangers and discover who mirrors whom is actually the way that the story evolves.
3:57 Am far enough in the book to sketch out a skeleton plot: Mari stays out all night in the city because her sister Eri has been sleeping at home for two months and won’t wake up, and during this all-nighter Mari helps a wounded prostitute and encounters a trombone-playing friend of her sister’s. Side-stories are the Chinese pimps who send mean-spirited motorcyclist messengers and a businessman who brutalizes the prostitute, both of which are meant to serve as odd metaphors of the sleeping sister’s story.
3:58 Discover that it’s 3:58 am in the book, and it’s also 3:58 here (pm). Marvel at the coincidence—I mean fate. Wonder whether I am in a universe of light while the characters are in a parallel universe of night.
4:13 Find Orwellian references cropping up—first an explicit reference, followed by the use of cameras to catch a criminal (as well as the camera narrator), and expanded upon by a Man with No Face who ominously watches—without blinking or turning his head—the sleeping sister (Murakami explicitly references Sleeping Beauty, but the Man with No Face also reminds me of Sartre’s gaze). Love the section where a character compares show trials to an octopus:
Like, say, an octopus. A giant octopus living way down deep at the bottom of the ocean. It has this tremendously powerful life force, a bunch of long, undulating legs, and it’s heading somewhere, moving through the darkness of the ocean. I’m sitting here listening to these trials, and all I can see in my head is this creature. It takes on all kinds of different shapes—sometimes it’s “the nation,” and sometimes it’s “the law,” and sometimes it takes on shapes that are more difficult and dangerous than that . . . and this creature, this thing doesn’t give a damn that I’m me or you’re you. In its presence, all human beings lose their names and their faces. We all turn into signs, into numbers.
Or, if extended metaphors aren’t your style, there are a few pages of dialog written like a play, in which characters reference the monitoring state rather baldly:
Kaoru: “You never know when there’s a camera watching you these days.”
Komugi: “The walls have ears—and digital cameras.”
4:27 Begin to worry that this book will not contain any cats, which would upend everything I thought I knew about Murakami.
4:29 Read about main characters tenderly feeding stray cats in a park. Wipe sweat off brow.
4:33 Realize that although Murakami is renowned for using a similar male protagonist in every book—a drifting and isolated man—this book actually has central female characters. But even though the female characters occupy center stage, many of them are underpowered and abused by males: a prostitute is beaten and a woman imprisoned. A mythic notion of gender, really, is where the underlying power of this novel comes from: oppressed women struggling to escape from sinister men.
4:46 Think about the ending but decide not to give it away because it would make my readers angry.
4:49 Renege on that idea and decide to reveal huge spoiler: there are coincidences.
4:58 Conclude that the book is philosophically intriguing in the way it deals with time and the haunting, omnipresent eyes and is innovative with the use of the plural first-person cinematic narrator, but that After Dark has more in common with Murakami’s two novellas that are only available in Japan—Pinball 1973 and Hear the Wind Sing—than with his short stories or his novels. It offers a lingering familiarity with likeable characters that lasts longer than his short fiction, but doesn’t offer the pleasure of fully immersing the reader inside the phantasmagoria of the story, as in longer books such as The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle.
5:01 Discover on the back matter that this book was typeset in Caledonia. Think about how much I love Caledonia. Think about how much I hate Sans Serif.
5:02 Fix dinner.
The latest posts at the blog of The Quarterly Conversation
I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...]
"What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions)
"Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER.
A fan of Herman Melville must have patience. He must appreciate digression and the dissolution of pattern or plan. He must enjoy the sheer rush of words, a proper Biblical torrent of them. And he must be able to find pleasure in philosophical dialogue as much as in wild anecdote. But must he read Clarel? Can [...]
This is just one small example.
Thomas Bernhard is certainly one of the major, titanic writers of any era, any country. Enormously influential, unremittingly bleak and pessimistic but never without a sense of humor, his style evolved into single-paragraphed philosophical rants extending hundreds of pages, the best of which are Woodcutters, ‘Walking’ (from Three Novellas), and Gathering Evidence. I have finally [...]
Ever since Penguin's 75th Anniversary roadtrip I have intended to address the somewhat simultaneous release of Penguin 75, a sort of vanity book of Penguin covers. This book is delightful, but flawed. Delightful, but misleading.
In The Unicorn Hunt (1993), the fifth book of Dorothy Dunnett’s cycle of historical novels of early Renaissance Europe, the House of Niccolo, Dunnett tells of the deficiencies of wealthy merchant Anselm Adorne’s relations with women thus: His wife Margriet could have warned him. He was familiar with motherly wives and the skittish ways of other [...]
Janet Holmes, director of Ahsahta Press, based at Boise State University in Idaho, took the time this week to share her thoughts on poetry publishing as part of my ongoing series of publisher profiles. Ahsahta publishes seven full-length collections of poetry a year, including recent works by Kate Greenstreet, Lisa Fishman, Rusty Morrison, and Julie Carr. Like some other small presses, Ahsahta offers a yearly subscription option, which is one of my favorite ways to buy poetry and encounter the work of many poets who are new to me, as well as poets whose newest books I always look forward to reading. Janet says more about this and what it's like to craft a press's identity and consistent aesthetic.
An unfortunate side effect to the lengthy transition of print to digital is our long suffering endurance of stale articles in mainstream media rehashing the same points as every other article in mainstream media.
The latest articles published in between issues
In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads.
Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to be considered as fiction or autobiography, laying claim to both. In Art Objects she writes: "The question put to the writer 'How much of this is based on your own experience?' is meaningless. All or nothing may be the answer. The fiction, the poem, is not a version of the facts, it is an entirely different way of seeing"; a "separate reality." At every turn she eludes the critic, the interviewer, the reader; she offers truth, but not the truth. "I'm telling you stories. Trust me."
It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback reissue. If it's signed, even more so. I'm only really interested in modern first editions (say, post-1950 or so)—before that books get quite expensive, but also I don't think they look as nice, since many were issued without dust jackets, and at that time the dust jacket wasn't considered a permanent part of the book, so they're often missing. So why the obsession and collecting, and why is it so important?
Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, say, Dale Peck); on the contrary, his criticism, even at its most polemical and uncompromising, is inexplicably bound to larger concerns about the direction of contemporary fiction. Two major concerns have dominated James Wood's writing: realism and religion. In The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief, his first collection, newly available in paperback from Picador, these two concerns are beautifully imbricated, resulting in what is surely among the finest achievements in recent literary journalism.
To say that Mark McMorris's Entrepôt is about writing poetry is to do a huge disservice to this beautiful and penetrating book, whose ostensible subject of contemplation is how to live, love, and make do in a time of war, if not cultural crisis. On the other hand, the book's greatest service, at least to my eye, is in its exploration of just what it means to be a poet—I should be more specific and say a lyric poet—amid our contemporary terrors.